This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
My edits have been subject to reversion for no stated reason. This is surely not behaviour that Wikipedia encourages. A previous change was backed out by an enthusiastic Irish Republican but the stated reasons were both inaccurate and provocative. Surely Wikipedia does not tolerate bullying, either?
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I apologise for any wrong-doing, but I am also disappointed that Wikipedia guidelines are apparently being misused by those who in the know. Rather than being blocked, I would appreciate the opportunity to pursue further the issues that have been raised tonight.
Decline reason:
3RR is one of the very few absolute rules that we have. I suggest spending some time during the block reading our policies so you will not make this mistake again. — John (talk) 22:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
