User talk:Jimi Lewis

Welcome!

Hello, Jimi Lewis! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Drm310 (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Babel (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making controversial changes that have already been discussed on the article's talk page, as you did at Babel (album), without first establishing consensus on the talk page. Your edits appear to have gone against established consensus and have been reverted. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet investigation

Please see this discussion. Beatlemanioose (talk) 19:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please log into your account before editing, rather than using your IP address to edit, as that is a violation of our policy on alternate accounts. --Rs chen 7754 20:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Picture Show (album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Zac Barnett, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The 1975 (album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Breakeven (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 21:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Before the Worst. Binksternet (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Script, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Script (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Script may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox musical artist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Science & Faith may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox album

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sleeping with a Friend may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{single
| Genre = [[New wave music|New wave]]<ref>{cite web|url=http://www.artistdirect.com/entertainment-news/article/listen-to-new-neon-trees-song-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Imagine Dragons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 17:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been asked several times to stop making changes without citing a source, but you have continued to do so. Many people feel strongly about the genres that are listed for bands, albums, and songs, and by making changes without a source, your edits are seen by others as disruptive -- which can lead to a block to prevent further disruption, as you've seen. Please, take some time to work with others constructively in the future. —Darkwind (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Sweater Weather, you may be blocked from editing. IPadPerson (talk) 00:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing again, this time for a substantially longer time, for continuing exactly the same kind of disruptive editing that led to the previous block. Please take notice of messages that are posted to you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spike Wilbury (talk) 17:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources

People want to be able to verify information on Wikipedia. So, significant edits need have their content cited using reliable sources. See verifiablity. This means that information must be published, and presumably vetted, by reliable groups and individuals. What you should do is to locate a source that supports the edit you wish to make. Then add a citation to that. Peruse wp:welcome to learn about editing Wikipedia. You can also visit the Teahouse for information and assistance. 183.171.175.217 (talk) 01:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Nahnah4. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Drive By (song) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nahnah4 | Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! | No Editcountitis! 05:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nahnah4 | Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! | No Editcountitis! 05:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]