User talk:Jimbo0619

A beer for you!

GIVER TO A BEER MY DUDE Sibs62 (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Please read WP:COPYVIO. Your recent addition to Polar ice packs added material essentially copied from a blog. Don't do that. Additionally, blog posts are not considered as WP:reliable sources. Vsmith (talk) 23:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vsmith is correct on all fronts. Please note that plagiarism and copyvio have been discussed in class along with the concept of reliable sources. Students have been advised to largely stay away from citing web sites or blogs. Links to all these issues of concern are in the assignment outline and/or the course Resources page.Sub specie aeternitatis (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-adding the same copyright violation text that has been previously deleted. You cannot simply add the same text over and over because you do not like the fact that others have deleted it (and they have done this correctly). You seem to be violating Wikipedia policies and copyright laws. Other editors will simply remove this kind of text. If you have read the above-noted articles about plagiarism and copyright violation and you need help clarifying the issues please set an appointment with me through Moodle. Our online ambassadors are also available to help via their Talk Pages. Please do not add the offending text again. Sub specie aeternitatis (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Usernames

You have not provided me with your real name so I cannot grade any of the work you have done on this assignment. All students have been clearly instructed to follow the link provided on Moodle to provide me with their Wikipedia username and their real name so that they can keep their real name off Wikipedia (maintain privacy) and so that I can grade their work on Wikipedia. Please make sure you follow the link on Moodle and complete the required online form to give me your username and real name or you may get a zero for this assignment. Sub specie aeternitatis (talk) 20:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excessively close paraphrasing

Hi Jimbo0619 -

I was recently reviewing your edits to polar ice packs, and, unfortunately, many of your contributions appear to consist of excessively close paraphrasing of the sources that you cited. Although brief close paraphrasing is acceptable, it's not okay to paraphrase so closely such a large amount of content on Wikipedia. Paraphrasing such a large amount of content constitutes a copyright violation, as well a violation of Wikipedia's policies. This is especially concerning given that you earlier directly cut and paste copyrighted material directly on to Wikipedia.

Because of the extensiveness of the close paraphrasing that I've already detected, I am going to be reverting every edit that you have made to that article, and also reviewing any other edits you have made. Please feel free to re-add any material that is not an excessively close paraphrase, but I feel like I need to err on the side of caution in removing material that you have added.

As a student at Mount Allison University, you should also be aware that repeatedly committing copyright infringement in the context of an academic assignment likely violates the policies of your university regarding academic integrity. Please feel free to contribute to Wikipedia in the future if you would like to do so, but please make sure that further content you contribute doesn't have this sort of problem. Kevin Gorman (talk) 05:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shale Gas Rules and Regulations

The article Shale Gas Rules and Regulations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no content, only an outline of what it should contain.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tazerdadog (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you are intending to finish working on theis article. If you intend to immediately bring it up to an OK standard, that is fine, just do it and remove the deletion tag. Otherwise, you might want to work on this in your userspace or the new Draft namespace. Cheers! Tazerdadog (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 4 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Shale Gas Rules and Regulations page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Reflsit

Template:Reflsit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 02:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shale gas rules and regulations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shale gas rules and regulations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shale gas rules and regulations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 00:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]