User talk:Jim Kinnaird

License tagging for Image:Field 40.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Field 40.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:O'Brien 40.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:O'Brien 40.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

The Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for your excellent work in completing the biographies of Parnellite MPs and completing Category:Parnellite MPs Damac 05:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Lalor

Thanks for your article creations; I'm currently writing a list of Stewards of the Chiltern Hundreds, so I work in the same general area. It is best to use the same layout as I've used here, with two = mark headings for subsections and no heading for the article. It is also advised to use succession infoboxes; I'll add them in here so you can see how they work. Again, thanks for the excellent work! Ironholds (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty, I've cleaned it up; some advice:

Have you autoconfirmed your account yet? If so you might want to do that; it gives you access to some very useful gadgets, including a 'cite' button on your toolbar which will automatically construct correct citations from the information you put in. If you haven't autoconfirmed go to the 'my preferences' menu to do so. If you have, go to the 'my preferences' menu, click 'gadgets' and then tick the refTools box and click save.
Dates are not normally linked. In addition when writing about commonwealth/similar people the format is '13 November' rather than 'November 13'
As previously mentioned, the headings should be two-level rather than three, and the page as a whole should not have a heading on the top.

Other than that everything seems excellent: If you need any help in relation to MP articles or anything else, give me a poke on my talkpage. Ironholds (talk) 22:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I note you don't seem to have enacted the changes I have advised. If you could do so? I keep having to go after you and clean up your articles. Ironholds (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:17Webscrap0503re.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:17Webscrap0503re.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Cullinan (Irish politician). Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission John Cullinan at Articles for creation

John Cullinan (Irish politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added inline citations as requested. In my opinion this makes the article look rather cluttered and I had the balance right the first time. It is really just a matter of opinion how many inline citations there should be when, as in this case, it is obvious that all of the facts about Cullinan's life were taken from one or other of the obituaries referenced. All three of these obituaries are online at http://www.irishnewsarchive.com/, so everything can be readily checked. I hope you will now release this article as there is yet more work to be done on it in the form of putting in the links from the existing numerous references to this person already contained in Wikipedia. Frankly I do not see myself bothering to place articles on Wikipedia in future if it is going to take so much trouble. In doing your refereeing task I think you need to give more consideration to the work you are creating for contributors and the constraints on their time. Wikipedia ought to be grateful for getting this contribution as it is a long-standing gap which it might be many years before anyone else takes the time to fill. (Jim Kinnaird)

Jim, only doing the job... and sorry you found it a pain. I am glad you have completed the article to this quality, and also to hear that plan to continue with improvements. I certainly didn't expect you simply to add more of the same three citations, though I understand exactly why this was the case here. The reason Wikipedia is so fussy about citations is that without them, in a place that anyone can edit at any time, there is no protection against either random and meaningless additions, or indeed sudden deletions. Citations, evidence, are the only things that distinguish reliable "facts" from opinion. Therefore, "original research" - possibly highly accurate and carefully studied - is forbidden; everything must have a reliable, third-party source. It is absolutely a lot of work adding one fact at a time with its citation, but the result is worth it. Major articles like Napoleon have taken editors thousands of hours of work (and 203 separate citations, some used repeatedly). By the way, a technical trick to repeat the use of one citation would partly avoid the 'lot of work' issue - if you give a citation a name 'ref name=Bloggs' then you can reuse it as necessary, just as 'ref name=Bloggs /' (with angle brackets, of course). Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:17Webscrap0503re.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:17Webscrap0503re.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jim Kinnaird. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]