User talk:Jim Fitzgerald/Archive 1

The principle of proportionality in Gaza war

JF, seems like you're quite new editor to Wikipedia. If indeed so, welcome. However, your recent edits in the articles I'm participating, violate certain WIki policies. For example, stating that Israel is not a party to 4th GC is technically true, but the whole sentence is attributed to the specific source; the source didn't say that and didn't mean to say that. If you think that is absolutely necessary, you'll have to find another reliable source to base it. Wiki policies does not allow self-speculations, original research, unsabstantiated claims, making biased edits and so forth. I'll ask my associate to provide you links to wiki policies so that you can understand them better. What is more, I'll appreciate if before making controversial edits, you'll discuss them first on a talk page of the articles. --Sceptic from Ashdod ^(talk) 10:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SA, the source we are talking about is a report called "International Law and the Fighting in Gaza" prepared by Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Page 20 of the report reads "Even if it were bound by the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel would be acting in full compliance with international law." From this sentence it is clear for a general reader that Israel is not party to 4th GC. Do you think it is still insufficient to reference the edit on this very source? --Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to multiple sources ([1], [2], even CAMERA say "Israel signed the Fourth Geneva Convention August 12, 1949 and ratified it on July 6, 1951". Israel's argument is that they dont apply in the occupied territories. Not that they dont apply to Israel. nableezy - 00:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake and clarification. Of course Israel IS a party of 4th GC, and my apologies. However, the principle of proportionality was introduced in 1977 in additional Protocol I. US and Israel did not ratify it. And this is what caused the confusion. The charges against Israel, as cited in the article, are that some attacks might have violated the principle, as stated in Article 51(5b) of Additional Protocol I. As you see, 4th GC is irrelevant here. You can say that Israel is not a party to the Protocol I (JCPA indeed says that "Israel, however, is not a party to the First Protocol and is therefore not bound by the provisions of Article 70."), but in this particular case I find it pointless.

As for 4th GC, Israel IS a party of 4th GC, and you simply misinterpreted the text. P. 18 says that "...Article 23 of the Fourth Geneva Convention requires parties to certain conflicts to permit transit to enemy civilian populations of a limited number of items and under a limited set of conditions. However, the fighting in and around the Gaza Strip is not a conflict covered by the Fourth Geneva Convention: the conflict is not one between state parties to the Convention, and Gaza is not occupied territory. Therefore, Israel is not bound by Article 23. Even if it were bound by the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel would be acting in full compliance with international law...". JCPA wanted to emphasize that 4th GC is inapplicable to the fighting in Gaza, nothing else. If you still have doubts, it could be easily proved that Israel is a party to 4th GC. --Sceptic from Ashdod ^(talk) 05:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do not we include that clarification into the article or is it already there? I think this is an important for a reader to know about it. --Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 05:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll include the clarification, but based on the recent Israeli Government report. Some excerpts, if you don't mind: "While Israel is not a party to either Additional Protocol I or the Rome Statute, it accepts these clarifications as reflective of customary international law...It is precisely because this balancing (to protect the lives of soldiers and the duty to minimise incidental loss of civilian lives) is difficult that international law confirms the need to assess proportionality from the standpoint of a “reasonable military commander,” possessed of such information as was available at the time of the targeting decision and considering the military advantage of the attack as a whole. Moreover, the balancing may not be second-guessed in hindsight, based on new information that has come to light; it is a forward-looking test based on expectations and information at the time the decision was made. This perspective is confirmed by the use of the word “anticipated” within the text of the rule itself, as well as in the explanations provided by numerous States in ratifying Additional Protocol I. ...for attacks planned in advance, each operation and target was considered on an individual basis (and reviewed by several authorities, including legal officers) in order to ensure that it met the requirements of proportionality. The same analysis was frequently repeated in the field based on real time data, immediately prior to an attack, to confirm that excessive civilian harm was not anticipated. On numerous occasions, this review led to a decision not to attack legitimate military targets, to avoid the possibility of civilian harm, even though such an attack might not be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage. ...The IDF also refrained from attacking Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, despite Hamas’ use of an entire ground floor wing as its headquarters during the Gaza Operation,118 out of concern for the inevitable harm to civilians also present in the hospital. On other occasions, attacks were approved using precision guided munitions, but the missiles were diverted moments before impact, because civilians were spotted in the target area. On still other occasions, a decision was made to proceed with a strike, but only under certain specified conditions designed to minimise civilian casualties, such as the time of the attack, the type of weapons permitted, or required precautions prior to attack." --Sceptic from Ashdod ^(talk) 06:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, go ahead. If anything, I will help you out.--Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 09:29, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About Fatah

I'll try to take a longer look soon. In the meantime, I recommend trying to isolate what's at issue and calling for a WP:3O. The editor there will not accept my opinion as impartial and you may have better luck if someone unrelated to editing in this subject area is attracted by the 3O. By the way, welcome, nice to have you here at Wikipedia. Tiamut^talk 08:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tiamut for your advise. Looking forward for your wiki-cooperation!--Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 08:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dsp Khalil al Mughrabi1, 1.jpg

I fixed this, should be fine. nableezy - 20:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nableezy, appreaciate your help!--Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 20:49, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A pro-Palestinian webcomic

Left a message for you on the article's talk page. --Sceptic from Ashdod ^(talk) 02:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it ain't broken

If it ain't broken, don't fix it, as they say. The quote in the Band's visit was fine before you started playing around with it. There is so much to be done on Wikipedia, I would suggest you concentrate on things that need improvement. --Gilabrand (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your written English and English comprehension leave much to be desired. Please stop introducing false information and substandard English. --Gilabrand (talk) 19:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page from Pappé's book

Hi Jim, I scanned the page in question and added it to my user page (it's copyrighted, so I figured it could only be added under a "fair use" rationale on a temporary basis). The reason I'm not so keen on having the non-publication mentioned is that it doesn't contribute anything, it's like saying that Ben Gurion had bad hair. True, but doesn't help the reader understand the reasons behind the 1948 exodus/Nakba. Also, reading between the lines from some user comments, the reason it was added there may have been to impugn the reliability of the report, which wasn't Pappé's point in mentioning the non-publication. --Dailycare (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Dailycare! I left my supportive stance on the issue at Talk page "Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus".--Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 8346b6e476c39df7a41e94f4fcd26f3a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Stop this vandalism.

If you have a dispute mark the spot with a request for a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.43.26 (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The I/P conflict, Wikiprojects and policies

Hi, I notice your recent change to Irgun where you desxcribe the King David Hotel bombing as a terrorist attack. I happen to agree with you, but please bear in mind WP:Terrorist which recommends avoiding describing a particular action or group as terrorist as opposed to saying that someone (the British government, for example) has described the action as terrorist. It can be irksome when the same individuals (Bibi Netanyahu and those Wikipedia editors who agree with him) may wish to deny that Irgun was terrorist and then describe similar actions by Palestinians as terrorist, but it isn't worth getting into an edit war to keep the T-word in the article.

You seem to be a relatively new editor especially interested in an area of Wikipedia content (the Arab-Israeli dispute) which has quite a high casualty rate in terms of editors on both sides being blocked, topic-banned etc. I therefore would recommend your familiarising yourself with policies such as WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:NPA, WP:3RR etc. as they are likely to come up frequently in editing conflicts.

You may also be interested in joining a WP:Wikiproject or two. WP:Israel, and WP:Palestine both cover a lot of articles in common but tend to attract editors with leanings in favour of one particular side (plus the most awkward editors on the opposing side). WP:IPCOLL is a project intended to encourage a balanced approach to material covering the conflict and also keep track of disputes and admin action taken against editors or on particular articles. There are plenty of projects on other areas of content too.

I also advise people to get involved in a broader range of articles than just those on political matters as when disputes occur admins tend to favour people committed to improving Wikpedia's broad range of coverage over those who are solely advocating political positions.

Any welcome and I hope to be involved with you fruitfully in the future.--Peter cohen (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to admit, you have raised valid points. I have reverted my last edit. Thanks.--Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. I'm surprised that the edit remained up there long enough for you to self-revert but your demonstrated willing position to reconsider controversial edits always looks good.--Peter cohen (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk archive

If you are going to archive a talk page, please do it properly:

this was done using a copy of rendered text to edit box
this was done into the wrong namespace and lacked proper headings
when you create a talk archive, you delete the stuff from the live talk page.

— RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this is not you who would reprimand me of doing technically wrong things in Wiki. Please be aware, that civility on Wiki is most important than a blunted attack on a fellow wiki-colleague. I am going to watch your every step, so to make sure that you do not bother others with this kind silly and irresposible accusitions of misconduct. Jim Fitzgerald ^post 17:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I consider my commemts above to be totally civil. How can you posibly deny making the two edits that I have linked to above? What was the purpose of those edits? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation - warning

I've warned you about this on Talk:Human rights in Israel, but you refused to comply, so I had to remove the offending section myself. Then I looked at your new addition to Human rights in Israel, identical to the text you placed in Arab citizens of Israel a while ago, and saw that's it's a copyright violation from the source - you just copied an entire paragraph, and changed the word order in a couple of places. I have no objection to the subject being discussed, but you must respect copyrights. You can only use the source for the facts, not the phrasing - rewrite the information in your own words, don't copy-and-paste. Please rewrite that paragraph ASAP. okedem (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright violation at all. If you think that there is one, I suggest you to follow the wiki procedures. Moreover, I am going to leave a warining message at your user page for attempting to use OR (misinterpreation of sourced articles to make the article unbalanced and intentionally biased). I am reverting your unbased deletes.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 09:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then you do not understand neither what plagiarism is, or what the article said. What I've added conforms to what the article says (you also don't understand what OR is, apparently) - look at paragraphs 4 and 5 (Starting with: "The special assistance budget is allocated...").

Since you refuse to comply with the standard used here, I am forced to report you. Note that I tried to discuss this with you, and you chose to attack me instead. okedem (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uri Avnery plagiarism

Here. It's not acceptable to copy large blocks of text directly from a source without quotation marks, even if you cite it.Prezbo (talk) 07:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Hello, Jim Fitzgerald. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 15:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. In addition, when you uploaded the screenshots you added to Kin-dza-dza!, did you not see that they can be used "for critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents" only? Dougweller (talk) 15:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation on Khalil al-Mughrabi

The material you have added to the article seems to have been copied, word for word, form the B'Tselem report, which is a copyright violation. I have tagged the article, per the instructions at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. It may be possible to rewrite the material so that it does not infringe on the copyright - please do so. Millmoss (talk) 19:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Khalil al-Mughrabi

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Khalil al-Mughrabi, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from , and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Khalil al-Mughrabi and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Khalil al-Mughrabi, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Khalil al-Mughrabi with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Khalil al-Mughrabi. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Khalil al-Mughrabi saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Millmoss (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will work on the article over the weekend. -- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 09:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deir Yassin

Jim, I noticed this edit you made was reverted. I thought there were some improvements in the edit, but have to agree with the other editors' comments overall. I hope you will consider participating on Talk. In particular I can't see how human shields should be euphemised as "screens" which is the term the article now uses. Please consider reintroducing your edits in stages and discussing to build consensus. Respectfully, RomaC (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, it would be appreciated if you'd join the discussion here rather than reverting. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 18:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not cooperating in making the article better. I understand that the better way to improve the wikiarticle is to make sure that the edits are re-conciled/cooperated with the main editors. I will now follow your advises, and again, apoligies for jumping into edits without discussing. -- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 14:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion and stop reverting. You're changing the meanings of the words. Militia does not equal troops or forces. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 19:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Hello. Concerning the photos you recently uploaded, you should add {{Non-free use rationale}} to their pages or another editor may tag them for deletion because they are missing important information. Please note that {{Non-free use rationale}} must be completed for every article in which the photo appears. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 20:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blind and rude...

I actually only noticed this today while re-vamping my user page. Thank you kindly and sorry for being so rudely ungrateful so far. MLauba (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thank you for your help :) -- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 12:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IDF_soldier_points_his_M16_rifle_at_4_years-old_Palestinian_child.jpg

I have tagged File:IDF_soldier_points_his_M16_rifle_at_4_years-old_Palestinian_child.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I can't find that image on the page you gave as a source. [3] Can you show me where it is exactly? It may mention the copyright holder in the cutline or surrounding text. which we need for a fair-use claim. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 21:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Slim, here it is, I have restored it! If asked for my POV, NEVER ever a good dignified soldier would point a weapon against any child in any curcumstances. The image is self-describing. I would not imagine what I what do with a man who would be close to pointing a gun against my own child. Again, this is my POV. File:IDF soldier points his M16 rifle at 4 years-old Palestinian child.jpg-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 16:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the photo has been edited to show this. Too many photos from the mideast have already been shown to be fake for me to trust any of them. 173.123.95.35 (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, can you say where you got it from? I'd like to look to see whether they say who the copyright holder is. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 00:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Explain

Please Explain this [4] Edit??? I would consider that vandalism. Zoo Pro 00:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there might have been mechanical mistake. :) -- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 05:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Derived from Internet"?

Jim, re: [[File:Human shield boy by Israeli soldiers.jpg]], you CANNOT say "derived from Internet" and expect that to be good enough. We need better information on where the image came from, or it'll have to be deleted. DS (talk) 14:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the image (http://interkulti.eu/Junglelaw/index.php/home/gaza-a-international-law/87-israeli-soldiers-gaza-accounts-unleash-storm-of-controversy )is added to the image page at Human shield boy by Israeli soldiers.

Orphaned non-free image File:Human shield boy by Israeli soldiers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Human shield boy by Israeli soldiers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 11:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is used in article Human shields.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 18:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marwan Barghouti 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marwan Barghouti 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not orphaned it is used in Marwan Barghouti article.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 23:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NFCC, especially point 3a. Wikipedia policy does not allow the use of this non-free image, and it has been removed from Marwan Barghouti once again. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC. There is no free image available that can convey equivalent significant information. Exactly because of that reason the image is calimed as fair-use.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 23:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You cant use that for living people as it is possible for a free equivalent to be created. Wikipedia generally does not allow for the use of non-free images of living people to identify that person (they may be used under other circumstances). nableezy - 23:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's a free image of Barghouti at the top of the article, so how can you say there is no free image available? — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But the existing image is 1. Cropped and thus is of very bad quality. 2. There is a part of another person on the pictire. 3. The non-free image is much better of quality than the free one. Bad images spoil the quality of the article as such. -- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 00:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia copyright hell. I know the free picture sucks, but under the WP:NFCC we are almost never allowed to use non-free images of living people—and certainly not when a free alternative exists. Sorry. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFC#UULP. I knew the rules said it somewhere in black and white, but I couldn't find it earlier. Try searching for a better free image. Maybe you'll find something. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you suggest me some tips for searching for free images on internet? Thanks!-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 11:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try flickr.com or some of the resources listed here and here. I can tell you from my own experience that looking for images that meet Wikipedia's copyright criteria is like searching for a needle in a haystack. Good luck. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-phosperous-weapons2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:White-phosperous-weapons2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nasser Shtayyeh mourns the death of his 5 days old baby daughter..jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nasser Shtayyeh mourns the death of his 5 days old baby daughter..jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Olga Mashnaya as Dekont (from the planet Alpha).JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Olga Mashnaya as Dekont (from the planet Alpha).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 21:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lyubshin as dyadya Vova Kin-dza-dza2.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lyubshin as dyadya Vova Kin-dza-dza2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of photo for textbook

Hello Jim Fitzgerald, McGraw-Hill wishes to reproduce your photo of Ertrugal Gazi Mosque in Ashbagat Turkmenistan.jpg. Can you please verify that you own the rights and that McGraw-Hill Contemporary Learning Series is allowed to use it inside a textbook? Please reply to me directly at shirley_lanners@mcgraw-hill.com for more details. Thank you, Shirley Lanners for McGraw-Hill CLS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma3dward (talk • contribs) 16:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord Moyne in 1941.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lord Moyne in 1941.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cast Away -Tom Hanks as Chuck Noland.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cast Away -Tom Hanks as Chuck Noland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 07:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cast Away -Tom Hanks as Chuck Noland.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cast Away -Tom Hanks as Chuck Noland.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 07:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Druze protest September 2009.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Humanshieldisrael.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Humanshieldisrael.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help in ruWiki

Привет Джим. Нужна твоя поддержка. "Патриоты", меня пытаются блокировать в рувики (см. ru:ВП:569). Пожалуйста прими участие в обсуждение. Участник Yankl. --109.253.210.155 (talk) 00:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Джим, спасибо за поддержку.

Ты спрашивал как со мной можно связаться. Это можно сделать по е-male через вики-почту, для этого перейди на мою страницу участника и нажми в левом меню опцию "Письмо участнику" (возможно для этого ты должен тоже в вики зарегестрировать свой е-мейл).

Янкл.--109.253.121.66 (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The real dress

Jim, Please check this website, http://www.turkmens.com/folkart.html. It shows the real Turkmen dresses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonic99 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Humanshieldisrael.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Humanshieldisrael.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Plot Spoiler (talk) 03:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Count Folke Bernadotte.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Count Folke Bernadotte.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sassongabai-filmawards-1.jpg

File:Sassongabai-filmawards-1.jpg: he's not dead; we won't accept a non-free picture that just shows what he looks like, see WP:NFC#UULP; 99.999% sure to be deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

antisemitism in turkey

I found some problems in this article you wrote and i have written them down on the discussion page of the same article, could you check them please? thanks. --Utkun (talk) 02:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: some grammar issues

Jim: FYI, there are a couple of grammar/spelling issues in your recent change, e.g. "do not tend much to distinguishe .." . I would say "tend much" is not quite right, etc. I'll be happy to help improve the wording, if you want, otherwise I'll assume that this is a work in progress. --Noleander (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noleander, please do hesitate to improve grammer or writing style. I will make several edits to the article within the next hour, and then you are welcome to proof-read it. And thanks for that.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 17:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling errors

There are a few spelling errors in your recent addition at this change. --Noleander (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need explanation of POV tag

Could you put some details about the POV tag on Judaism and violence in that article's Talk page? Speicifically: what needs to be done to resolve the POV issues? thanks. --Noleander (talk) 16:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I have already done it.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 16:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judaism and peace

Hello, Jim. I've removed your addition to the article. Probably it belongs to Judaism and violence article. IMHO the two articles are a POV fork but let's, at least, try to keep them both on topic. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Racism in Israel

You have violated 1RR on the Racism in Israel article. Please see the notice at the top of the article. I have warned you about 1RR before here. If you do not self-revert I will report you. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 16:28, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you, please, substantiate your claims with diffs?-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 16:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see, there was 1 hour yet to go, be diligent next time.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 18:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Israel-Iran relations

You have violated the 1 RR on Israel-Iran relations- and I see this is not your first violation this week. Do not delete sourced material. --Yespleazy (talk) 15:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am puzzled, was the first edit a revert?-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 16:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the material was there, and you deleted it, the answer is yes. It was a revert. Furthermore, you have no basis for the claim that the source is not reliable. The Christian Science Monitor has won several Pulitzer Prizes. Please restore what you deleted. --Yespleazy (talk) 16:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox References

Template:Campaignbox References has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

False edit summary

Hello Jim,

This edit summary was not a correct "summary" of the edit you made. Please in the future make sure your edit summaries accurately summarize your edits. Best, --brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Robert Faurisson has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A reference you cited has failed verification

User:Jim Fitzgerald, please visit the Discussion page at Jewish religious terrorism. An edit you made was found not to correspond to the reference cited and was tagged with Template:Failed verification.—Biosketch (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jim Fitzgerald/Ayala Abukasis

I have renominated User:Jim Fitzgerald/Ayala Abukasis for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jim Fitzgerald/Ayala Abukasis (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 10:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Lord Moyne in 1941.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lord Moyne in 1941.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Lord Moyne in 1941.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lord Moyne in 1941.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uri Gavriel

The article Uri Gavriel has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nik thestoned 11:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ShahrokhK.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ShahrokhK.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aftonbladet's page of the article written by Donald Bostrom.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aftonbladet's page of the article written by Donald Bostrom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]