User talk:JillianAWeedmark

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, JillianAWeedmark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for User talk:Malik Shabazz. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sheening

Hi Jillian, I understand that keeping the article about "sheening" may be important to you, but it may be contrary to some of Wikipedia's policies. I'm going to leave a note at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheening explaining the problems with the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's not an easy process, but it doesn't have to be finished tonight. The deletion discussion will continue for several days, during which you can continue to improve the article. Good luck. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page re: your comment on Sheening, but here's a copy of what I posted there:
The fundamental problem here to me is that regardless of the frequency of use of the word, the entry is still a dictionary definition; while Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wiktionary is a far more appropriate location for submitting dictionary terms. See Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary for more on this.
Even if you can resolve that issue, the article still must meet the criteria of notability (see WP:N for Wikipedia's criteria of what it takes be be notable). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]