User talk:Jiky

Notability of Monk Memozeowski

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Monk Memozeowski, by Precious Roy (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Monk Memozeowski seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Monk Memozeowski, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoax articles

As you appear to be doing with your series of "Monk Cartoon" articles. There are zero verifiable sources for this. Continuing to create these articles may result in your account being blocked. I notice you have some edits about cartoons that actually exist... try focusing on that. Thanks,--Isotope23 ^talk 19:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense of Sheldon in Law

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sheldon in Law, by The Storm Surfer (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sheldon in Law provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sheldon in Law, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case 18:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]