User talk:Jhutch2872/Inequality within publicly traded companies

This user page was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2015. The result of the discussion was Userfy.

This is a subpage of Jhutch2872's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Jennifer, This is a great topic. It sounds a little bit like "high road" vs. "low road" approaches to economic development. See http://www.policymattersohio.org/moving-on-up-what-high-road-development-means-and-means-to-us In the case of high road approaches, owners and managers invest in the human capital of their employees. They pay more but then also are compelled to get more productivity out of their employees. In a sense, owners are incentivized to invest in their employees and compete based on the value-added and quality of their product. In the case of low-road, the company competes based on price. The company will try to pay as little as possible because it's not competing based on quality or value-added but on sheer volume. Anyway, you might just write about one of those approaches "Retain-and-Reinvest" or "Downsize-and-Distribute." You'll want to cite economic development literature to identify 1) which approach is used most often; 2) examples of the approaches; and 3) controversies. A couple of stylistic points: 1) check your spelling, capitalization and style. 2) Try to remove extra words. You write, for example, "Businesses use to use a method known as the “Retain-and-Reinvest” approach" Should be "Businesses used a method known as the "Retain-and-Reinvest" approach." When did they do that? When did it stop? Nice startMcassell04 (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good summary of what your article will be about, but I am unclear as to what exactly the topic is. This is partly an organizational problem and partly because you do not start the summary by saying the exact topic you're writing about. You should give the title of your topic then define it. I know the original assignment was just a summary so I had the same problem. I look forward to seeing your progress! Katelynyac (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not getting to you sooner on your peer review. If I might make a few suggestions I would run through your grammar and style usage, " use to use" shouldn't be used. Follow the instructors tips on that one. You should add links for the Dodd-Frank act and the programs/agencies that you have listed. Use the tools provided by wikipedia to make those links. There still is not an easily recognizable focus in this topic and you could do with more sources. I suggest watching the training videos over again, they really helped me while I was working on my article. Tbills2 (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keiser Report

This issue is often discussed in the Keiser Report. Biscuittin (talk) 17:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review for article

I think your article is done well, and the topic is very interesting . The way in which you set it up seems to be very clear and well organized. I don't have much criticism because I myself am still trying to figure it all out. You seem to have a good grasp on the subject and how to use wiki. I enjoyed your article and learning more about the subject.

Lmarzill (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Leah Marzilli Lmarzill (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]