User talk:Jhureley1977

Welcome!

Hello, Jhureley1977, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rajkumar Misra, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! noq (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajkumar Misra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Rajkumar Misra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rajkumar Misra

Sorry for the delayed response, I had forgotten you'd left a message after I moved it down for chronological ordering; that erased the little notification bar one gets and you know what they say: out of sight, out of mind. Moving on...

Your article was deleted for a multitude of reasons, most of them related to the apparent absence of notability. On Wikipedia, notability is one of the cornerstones of article creation; if an article clears the general notability guidelines then it usually has a good chance at remaining here. Your article, though, failed to demonstrate any notability by Wikipedia standards. You have sources that mention the man, but the article itself doesn't appear to give any justification as to why he would warrant an article here. There was no mention of a nobel prize, or a lifetime acheivement award, or a president unit citation, or a quantum theory of energy, or any information on his world altering patent for wireless energy, or his legendary copyrighted ad campaign for Microsoft, or Apple, or IBM, or so forth in matter. Compounding the problem of notability in your particular case are the notability guidelines for biography articles, which set additional restrictions upon the articles concerning biographical figures - living and dead. You do, however, have a chance at retaining the article from a notability perspective if it can be demonstrated that your professor meets the criteria listed at Wikipedia:Notability (academics).

The other problem with the article is that the lettering, bolding, and choice of words and phrases lead to a perception that the article was written to promote the man. Bolding is usually only seen once in the article and that is in the first line when the first instance of a person's name is made. Other than that, there should really be no reason to bold anything else in the article. Additionally, you really need to steer clear of words like "illustrious", "highly", "dynamic", "some of the most", and "renown". Off Wikipedia these words may build up a person's reputation, but on Wikipedia words like this are on a "watchlist" of sorts since they are often interpreted as a desperate attempt by an editor to add some sort of notability to a clearly non-notable person in the vain and fleeting hope that the article may be able to stave off an attempt by the Wikipedia community to delete the article.

Now if you want to rebuild the article, or if you want a copy of your deleted material so you can work on it, I'm open to restoring and returning the material. Note though that in the condition the article was in at the time of deletion it would need a lot of help before it could come back onto Wikipedia and have a chance to survive. Alternatively, if you feel the deletion is in error you are free to contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Many Thanks TomStar81 (Talk). I will implement these and send the article for review before publish. Jhureley1977 (talk) 09:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunder Prasad (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The very first sentence 'Pandit Sunder Prasad (Died May 30, 1970) was one of the only few Gurus of two Gharana (school) - Jaipur Gharana and Lucknow Gharana of the Indian classical dance form, Kathak', is referenced by a book selling website that has nothing on the clam itself. Simply not acceptable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jhureley1977/Sunder Prasad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 15:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jhureley1977, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 15:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunder Prasad (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

First reference is about a Mohanrao Kallianpurkar and the second is from what appears to be a dance studio. Please do not resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jhureley1977/Sunder Prasad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 15:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sunder Prasad has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sunder Prasad. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sunder Prasad has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sunder Prasad. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunder Prasad has been accepted

Sunder Prasad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yashwant Vaishnav (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Newslinger was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately, the Ustad Bismillah Khan Yuva Puruskar award doesn't qualify Vaishnav for an article under Wikipedia's notability criteria for musicians, since it's not a major music award (e.g. Grammy, Juno, Mercury). Please provide at least 2 reliable sources showing that Vaishnav meets the general notability guideline, or at least 1 reliable source showing that he meets the notability criteria for musicians. You can submit this draft again after adding these sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yashwant Vaishnav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yashwant Vaishnav, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Newslinger talk 14:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yashwant Vaishnav (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Newslinger was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi Jhureley1977, thanks for the correction on the Ustad Bismillah Khan Yuva Puraskar award. That award appears to qualify Vaishnav under the notability guidelines for musicians. However, Vaishnav's age, the "Early life" section, and the first sentence of the "Career" section aren't supported by any sources. Please add reliable sources to support these sentences, or remove the content from the article, before submitting the draft again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yashwant Vaishnav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yashwant Vaishnav, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Newslinger talk 09:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ustad Bismillah Khan Yuva Puraskar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ustad Bismillah Khan Yuva Puraskar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). It also appears to be incomplete.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Rosguill^talk 22:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yashwant Vaishnav (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yashwant Vaishnav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yashwant Vaishnav, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 03:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yashwant Vaishnav

Hello, Jhureley1977. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yashwant Vaishnav".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]