User talk:Jhelbing
| This user is a student editor in George_Washington_University/Neural_Circuits_and_Behavior_(Fall_2019) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jhelbing, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Feedback Page
[edit]Feedback for Article - Repolarization: I recommend adding images and/or graphs to enhance the understanding of the topic. As a specific example, your group can include an image of an action potential and specifically highlight or label the section of the action potential that is repolarizing. Overall I believe that the content presented is neutral and precise to the point, which I think enhances the article rather well. A neutral tone creates a great balance that is not biased or geared towards one opinion (this topic is not very opinion based anyways, but the point still stands). I do not see any outstanding grammar errors or spelling errors. In the bibliography, the list of sources seem a bit excessive for the small size of the article itself. May I recommend going through the sources and check to see if your group can use the same source for multiple statements. This will cut down the large bibliography to match the available literature in the article. I believe that the article matches and meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements - this article is supported by 2-3 reliable sources for the subject discussed. --Jpeloquin17 (talk) 01:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Feedback - Repolarization: The introduction of repolarization really guides the reader into the supporting subtopics. I also recommend adding an image(s) of the K+ channels that could help the reader understand the mechanism and location of where repolarization occurs and how. Group members can even add the voltage graphs (potentials) to help with the timing and when repolarization occurs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miaprado (talk • contribs) 14:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Feedback: Overall, the article looks good to me. However, I recommend maybe moving the section of Deviations from Normal Repolarization as the first section to somewhere towards the end. I think it's beneficial to the reader to be able to read about normal repolarization and how it happens first before reading about deviations from it. Also, the Lead mentions the absolute refractory period that happens but I did not see it elaborated on later in the article. It would also be beneficial to elaborate on this either in its own section or under another section. Along the same lines, in the section of Ventricular Repolarization, I think that the statement about pharmaceuticals that produce the same effect as repolarization should be elaborated on. This way, the statement is exemplified. Ambikakhurana (talk) 02:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)