User talk:Jgins
December 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to John Lennon have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:40, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- One of the Bloody Sunday victims was an active IRA supporter, and nail bombs were found: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/may/19/bloodysunday.northernireland (Jgins (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC))
- Your edit stated, "Stanley Parkes confirmed the singer had funded IRA terrorism". The source simply stated, "had given money to the IRA", with no mention of "funding terrorism". In fact, the source never uses the word "terrorism". Those two statements do not have identical meanings. You should only report what is explicitly stated in the source, not your personal interpretation of what the source says. Your edit distorted the source and made a defamatory statement. If you do something like that again, you could lose your editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- I wonder what the IRA spent the money on? (Jgins (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2022 (UTC))
- You just made my point. You have to "wonder" to jump to your conclusion about funding terrorism because that is not stated in the source. My warning stands. Don't misrepresent a source again. Sundayclose (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- I wonder if the IRA might have bought weapons with Lennon's money? (Jgins (talk) 20:31, 18 December 2022 (UTC))
- You're making pointless comments that continue to make my point. I'm finished here, but I'm watching your edits. Sundayclose (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- I wonder if the IRA might have bought weapons with Lennon's money? (Jgins (talk) 20:31, 18 December 2022 (UTC))
- You just made my point. You have to "wonder" to jump to your conclusion about funding terrorism because that is not stated in the source. My warning stands. Don't misrepresent a source again. Sundayclose (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- I wonder what the IRA spent the money on? (Jgins (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2022 (UTC))
- Your edit stated, "Stanley Parkes confirmed the singer had funded IRA terrorism". The source simply stated, "had given money to the IRA", with no mention of "funding terrorism". In fact, the source never uses the word "terrorism". Those two statements do not have identical meanings. You should only report what is explicitly stated in the source, not your personal interpretation of what the source says. Your edit distorted the source and made a defamatory statement. If you do something like that again, you could lose your editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Bloody Sunday (1972)) for edit warring and continuing to add content to the article despite opposition on the talk page.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:HarveyCarter per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarveyCarter. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.