User talk:Jggf
A tag has been placed on Trey Pelton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 03:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Theheartbreakkid smallposter.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Theheartbreakkid smallposter.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Theheartbreakkid smallposter.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Theheartbreakkid smallposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Speedy deletion of Trey pelton
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Trey pelton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ChetblongTalkSign 06:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Trey pelton
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Trey pelton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Trey pelton. slakr\ talk / 06:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Trey pelton
[edit]I have nominated Trey pelton, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey pelton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. slakr\ talk / 07:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Trey pelton. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —slakr\ talk / 07:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Trey pelton. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —slakr\ talk / 07:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Trey pelton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —slakr\ talk / 07:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Attack page
[edit]Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Trey pelton. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. We only get about 50 of these type of pages a day, where kids make up joke pages about their friends. You've been asked to provide sources for this unlikely biography, and you haven't. Stop wasting our time. Any more attacks and you'll be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 07:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey pelton, you will be blocked from editing. —slakr\ talk / 07:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
—slakr\ talk / 07:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Jggf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm so sorry, my friend Trey, who went on my account made a site about him and was pissed off whe you deleted it. I am terribly sorry! Please forgive me, I promise it won't happen again! I love wikipedia and I love to correct mistakes. Again, I am very sorry for my dumb friend
Decline reason:
As a matter of practice, we do not believe the "my friend did it" excuse. You are responsible for your account. Wait for the block to expire and do not vandalise again. — Sandstein (talk) 07:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Will someone please answer my block?
— Sandstein (talk)
[edit]Hey! You obviously don't believe me, so let me ask you this, WHY IN THE HELL WOULD I POSSIBLY MAKE A PAGE ABOUT MY FRIEND TREY!!! If you look in my contributions history, there is absolutely no nonsense what so ever! So how dare accuse me of just suddenly abusing wikipedia!, You my friend should be blocked, not me!
Jggf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
'm so sorry, my friend Trey, who went on my account made a site about him and was pissed off whe you deleted it. I am terribly sorry! Please forgive me, I promise it won't happen again! I love wikipedia and I love to correct mistakes. Again, I am very sorry for my dumb friend;Hey! You obviously don't believe me, so let me ask you this, WHY IN THE HELL WOULD I POSSIBLY MAKE A PAGE ABOUT MY FRIEND TREY!!!If you look in my contributions history, there is absolutely no nonsense what so ever! So how dare accuse me of just suddenly abusing wikipedia!, You my friend should be blocked, not me!
Decline reason:
After reviewing your request, I have decided to decline. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. — nat.utoronto 08:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Generally threatening the deleting admin with future disruption tends to be frowned upon here. --slakr\ talk / 08:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Bring It On: All or Nothing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks Astral (talk) 03:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Kris Linnell GAY?. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 02:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit]Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Josh Cooke. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Will (talk) 02:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Kris Linnell GAY?, you will be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 02:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)