Jump to content

User talk:Jfioeawfjdls453/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Barnstars 'R' U

[edit]
The Hidden Page Barnstar
I award you one for finding Trekphiler's page for people who always think that "new message" bar is real. Aren't you glad you checked your mail? TREKphiler hit me ♠ 22:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Im so scared

[edit]

GTFO —Preceding unsigned comment added by KatieTheWickedPrincess (talk • contribs) 20:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Avro Arrow

[edit]

You also removed the Canada Aviation Museum? I have added that back; perhaps check the article talk page before undoing long-standing entries. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

My mistake. That one should stay. Addionne (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As to the note by the Avroland editor, thanks for pointing that out, as it is the first time I have seen it, and must refer to an earlier work that I had written in 2007. The other names are authors and researchers whose contribution must have been useful in the creation of the site, and although I have met the website developer on a number of occasions and even lent him material, I have no other interest in Avroland. As far as I know, Jason runs a non-commercial site based on his extensive collection of Avro Canada archival materials and research using other tertiary sources. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Agency Republic

[edit]

Hello Addionne, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Agency Republic, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010)

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2010, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.


Talk

[edit]

Um, hi. This is Emily Schooley here, same as but the actual person not whoever posted the original article. (Feel free to email me at one of the addresses listed on my site for confirmation.) i appreciate your mature stance on things... yes, i did out Frozen North and will provide appropriate evidence of poor practices where it's necessary (ie not here.) i'm flattered someone made me a page, and kind of disappointed that what seems like the guys at Frozen North are trying to harass me (again) by trying to have it deleted. What do i need to do to calm everything down and put the drama llamas to sleep? :P (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Schooley) —Preceding unsigned comment added by EmilySchooley (talk • contribs) 23:50, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afd Emily Schooley

[edit]

Hi Addionne, I'm not able to post on the dispute page due to the semi-protected status, but I was curious about the comment you left stating "WP:NACTOR states that if an actor has significant roles in several notable movies, then they would be considered notable. I think Miss Schooley meets this particular requirement. Just because something doesn't have a Wikipedia article, does not mean it is not notable - and some of the films have been the subject of significant coverage in multiple sources, and several have won awards from reputable sources." Specifically which of these 'several films' Schooley has appeared in are considered notable from reputable sources? I should note that FernTV is not a credible source and is a blog where many of the articles do not even have a byline. In addition, the igossip.com website is a website that exclusively posts user-generated content. I see one notable film on Schooley's resume- "Small Town Murder Songs", in which she plays "News Reporter". I don't see any awards from reputable sources either. In fact the first line in Schooley's article is an un-cited claim that she has "won awards for her on-screen performances". I see some coverage for a film called "Black Eve", but that appears to still be in post-production and Schooley is not a top-billed actress. I understand that Schooley is "an up and coming actress" and she wants her fans to be able to "track her progress" as an actress- but that's what her website/twitter/facebook is for- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for already-notable subjects. Thanks for any clarification.

Edit: additionally, the two films for which Schooley has received nearly all of her 'coverage' are "Black Eve" and "One Week In Windchocombe". Two films that are not completed, have no studio affiliation, no distributor or plans for theatrical release (or even a wide DVD release). Who knows, these films could strike it big on the festival circuit in the next couple of years, but neither film at this point is notable. 

Deepsix66 (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Deepsix66[reply]
Hey,
The fact that these movies come out in the future has no impact - they both have coverage in multiple, independent sources. That is sufficient to make them notable under WP:GNG, according to my interpretation. The community may not agree, but we will see how the AfD discussion goes. -Addionne (talk) 22:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the quick response. JoBlo and Fangoria are definitely legit sources. Almost every article I saw in the google link you provided for "One Week..." seems to be from indie blogs with lax submission policies in terms of the material they cover (http://www.fatally-yours.com/contact-us/) In fact, I'd go as far as saying none of them are reliable, unbiased sources. Several of the Google results are from iGossip as well (user-generated content). The fact that the films have not yet been completed is incredibly important for one reason- the films themselves may already be notable (although I don't agree), but by your definition Schooley must have "significant roles" in several notable films. Until these films are completed and released to the public, we really have no idea how significant her role is. A lot can change in the editing process and for all we know, her role may be far smaller than is being written. For an example of this, see how her role in "Two Bucks Short" was described on her page and then view the link I provided in the article, which confirms her role was only 4 seconds long. Finally, considering Schooley's television experience was in a "series" that was filmed in 2008 and never completed, there is some ambiguity in terms of whether these entirely-independent films will ever see any measure of release or completion. Without a distributor, studio, any festival acceptances, or DVD release- how on earth are these films going to be viewed by anything resembling a mass audience? How can they be notable if nobody can see them? If there was a press release announcing some sort of distribution channel, things would be different, but at this point this is no different than me announcing that I am making a film in my backyard and getting some blogs who need content to relay the information. Considering there is no established/name-talent in these films, what have these films accomplished that makes them notable? Convinced a blog to post some photos from their set? If this is all it takes to be entered into the encylopedia, I have a feeling indie filmmakers will be coming here in droves. I think I've said all I need to say, I appreciate the forum. Deepsix66 (talk) 22:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Deepsix66[reply]

Addionne, I have asked on the AfD that you list the movies that you feel makes her notable - this will help all those involved in the discussion. Keeping the debate here limits its usefulness, I'm sure you'll agree! Bigger digger (talk) 13:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The fiasco

[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at GorillaWarfare's talk page.

Re: Your comments on my page... You and me both, hon. it's immature, ridiculous, petty, and a number of other things. i should not be a 'fiasco' until i do something 'notable' like sleeping with Brad Pitt. Problem is (as can be seen by their edit history) Frozen North is perpetuating the BS even now. Glad to see that someone removed the vandalism on my page and that someone blocked them for their vandalism. Hopefully they'll grow up soon and find other projects to dwell on.

And i appreciate you taking the time to do some research so that you could be properly educated to vote, btw. Seems like people are just chiming in with arbitrary keep or delete, for the most part, and some folks are showing clear bias one way or another.

Anyway, hope you have an awesome weekend! EmilySchooley (talk) 09:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you were one of the very few reasonable people in the original AfD discussion, thought you may be interested to know that the submission was, in fact, done as spite, and the subject has proof thereof. [1] [2] Makes me mad to see the jerk get away with it, but we're working on finding a way to bring the article back that adheres to notability. Thanks for taking the time to do some research. Bytemeh (talk) 02:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Completed Arrows

[edit]

See my response on the talk page. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Harsh Vardhan Jain, Jagmandar Dass Jain

[edit]

Kindly see the Articles in Category:Indian businesspeople may be more than 80% will be deleted due to one or other reasons.

Kindly see the corrections been done in the Articles contributed Harsh Vardhan Jain, Jagmandar Dass Jain etc.

The reason is not known but after 2 mths of Article been posted in Wikipedia, May be due to Contribution by Indians in Wikipedia is not been liked by you, so best of luck.

ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HarryMagic. Although I recognize your frustration at my decision to nominate your article for deletion, I do not appreciate the accusation of racism. I simply felt that the article did not assert notability of the subject based on the clear guidelines found at WP:BIO. In the end, it is a community site and the deletion is open to a discussion in which your argument to keep the article will have as much weight as mine. If you are convinced of a racist intent on my part, please feel free to report my actions to an administrator. You can easily see a list of my edit history in order to gather evidence of any perceived bias on my part. -Addionne (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No I dont want to report or dispute with anyone. I am not frustrated. Only request I made was that there was a confusion today morning by User:NawlinWiki and then others followed it too. I want to express is that approx 4500 view for the Articles and if there was any incorrect information then it would have been come in notice long back.

Explaination of Confusion where User:Nawlinwiki expressed that Article was Deleted earlier :

17:42, October 19, 2010 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "Harsh Vardhan Jain" ‎ (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content))

01:12, October 4, 2010 Deb (talk | contribs) deleted "Harsh Vardhan Jain" ‎ (G6: Deleted to make way for move)

But, as on 4 Oct 2010 it was a redirect done by User:Deb, No deletion was done. For further confirmation kindly contact User:Deb.

ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 19:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only Warning

[edit]

If you, ever again, removed someone else's posts from a talk page as you did here, I will personally take you to ANI. There are rules for talk page discussion too. Perhaps you should read up on our WP:RULES, as you seem not to know them very well. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, and I was in the wrong here. If you feel the need to report my actions, please feel free to do so. Contrary to how it may seem to you after our AfD disagreement, I am not here to cause trouble or make enemies. I hope that we are able to get over that and, while we may not be friends, at least work amicably together in the future. -Addionne (talk) 02:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No reporting this time, cause you apologized. I take radio and TV articles very seriously, hence my replies. I know alot of people in WP:WPRS have worked very hard to make those what they are today and update them constantly. We don't have as many people as we previously did, but we still have enough to actively update. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I get that. Wikipedia can bring out a lot of emotion in people, and your passion for broadcasting articles was clear. While I stand by my deletionist tendencies, I wish you the best of luck with WPRS. Which, by the way, is probably also a radio station.  :) -Addionne (talk) 03:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, two of them. WPRS-FM in Waldorf, Maryland and WPRS (AM) in Paris, Illinois. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now, isn't that funny...

[edit]

As I watched the gently scrolling company names, the same thought occurred to me. (Probably means we both have nasty, suspicious minds. (I have...)) And when you Google them, they don't seem to be doing much of any note other than getting registered. All the group site seems to be is a list and photo gallery. You missed Ritz Boulevard, and I can't find what that does, either. I think this is the best one since the German bishops case (which spread out to the German, French and Italian Wikipedias). Thought: "Mr Fixit" - wasn't that originally Adnan Kashoggi? And he could... Peridon (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I didn't make that Mr. Fix-It connection, but yes... I also went through the pictures on the site (when you click the State Heads link.) At a glance (I'm no expert) they appear as though they could actually be legit. Several of them have officials from West Nottinghamshire College, so I suspect if we looked deeper into this whole thing, we'd find that there is a connection between Jain and this school. If I had to guess, it is some work with this school that has given him opportunity to travel and shake hands with state heads - and it was decided to leverage this photo evidence into some appearance of notability. -Addionne (talk) 15:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could be interesting to do a Google Images search for one or two of those people and see what comes up. When I get a moment... Peridon (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What's the Leicester connection? The Mayor's shaking his hand but I can't remember if it said why. Peridon (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, doesn't say. There are two pictures of it - he appears to be reading something or giving a speech at an event. -Addionne (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 2 — 3rd Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2010, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jfioeawfjdls453/Archive_7&oldid=1140489827"