User talk:Jevoussaluemarie

Welcome!

Hello, Jevoussaluemarie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bill Nelson. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Marquardtika (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gonzaga University have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gonzaga University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gonzaga University, you may be blocked from editing.

I suggest you go to Talk:Gonzaga University and explain why you are removing the statment that it is a Roman Catholic school. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Intelligent design, you may be blocked from editing. Use the article talk page to make your case. Do not continue to edit war. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 22:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC) ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 22:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Intelligent design shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bishonen | talk 13:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]