User talk:Jevon Tompkins

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Jevon Tompkins. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Do not add hoax articles to Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 22:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. —tregoweth (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Movie

Please do not remove the tag future from the article. Wikipedia, and for that matter any encyclopedia, are not supposed to contain info about future events. You can remove it after the film's release. Kai A. Simon 21:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Gonna Git You Sucka

Please don't move article arbitrarily, as you did with I'm Gonna Git You Sucka. It is considered vandalism. —tregoweth (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's On (Petey Pablo) 187um Killa‎

Please stop creating this; it makes no claim to the notability of its subject (which, indeed, appears to have none), has no sources, and thus meets our criteria for speedy deletion (which is why it's been deleted twice). Note also:

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wesley Jonathan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 20:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jevon Tompkins

I do not no all of that stuff why are you trying to block me off and all of the stuff is true?

I'm not sure that I understand your question, but you need to read WP:CITE and Wikipedia:Edit summaries, as well as WP:Notability. These are our policies and guidelines, and if you keep violating them you'll be blocked from editing. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 15:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Block

For personal abuse. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 19:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Str8 off tha Streetz of Compton City

I've AfDed two article created by you; you might want to defend them against the strong suspicion that they're hoaxes, or at least wholly unnotable. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks.

With regards to your comments on User talk: Mel Etitis: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acalamari 18:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too late for warnings

You've earnt yourself an editing block. When the block expires, please behave yourself, otherwise the next block will be longer. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to Wikipedia articles about living persons, as you did to Wesley Jonathan. Thank you. NrDg 20:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CSD Notification

A tag has been placed on Killer movie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy and paste of Scary Movie. Not an alternative title

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Speedy deletion of Killer movie

A tag has been placed on Killer movie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NrDg 21:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Killer Movie

A tag has been placed on Killer Movie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NrDg 21:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TBA (New Edition album)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article TBA (New Edition album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Jevon Tompkins, you will be blocked from editing. NrDg 06:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pulp Fiction

Your additions to the article concerning Carolco's reputed involvement will continue to be reverted unless you can provide sourcing for your claims. I have examined all the standard reference works discussing the film and do not find a single mention of Carolco. Please familiarize yourself with our policies: Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources.

In the future, please be particularly careful about adding unverified material that distorts and misrepresents quotations and other cited content. When you change

Pulp Fiction premiered in May 1994 at the Cannes Film Festival. The Weinsteins "hit the beach like commandos", bringing the picture's entire cast over.^[1]

to

Pulp Fiction premiered in May 1994 at the Cannes Film Festival. The Weinsteins and Mario Kassar alongside with Andrew Vajna "hit the beach like commandos", bringing the picture's entire cast over.^[2]

you are distorting the verifiable content of the quoted material. The author makes no mention of Kassar or Vajna, let alone describes them as "hit[ting] the beach like commandos," as he does the Weinsteins. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Quotations, and note especially, "As an editor, it is your responsibility to read the source of the quotation thoroughly, in order to prevent misrepresentation." Best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh. I see what's going on.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pulp Fiction, you will be blocked from editing. —DCGeist (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism tag

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Poetic Justice, you will be blocked from editing. —DCGeist (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:213986.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:213986.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Res-Dogs-C.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Res-Dogs-C.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 17:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wesleyjonathan1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wesleyjonathan1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Cinergi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Cinergi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:C2pictures.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:C2pictures.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:NewEdition2008.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NewEdition2008.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get Back (film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Get Back (film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mtv.com/movies/movie/199495/moviemain.jhtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Must Die

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mona Must Die, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mtv.com/movies/movie/91715/moviemain.jhtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Mona Must Die. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NrDg 12:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Get Back (film). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NrDg 12:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Ming Lo Moves the Mountain. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NrDg 13:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ming Lo Moves the Mountain

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ming Lo Moves the Mountain, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NrDg 13:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Jeffersons

Hello. I've removed the "rumor" concerning The Jeffersons per WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL. If you can find a reliable source that discusses an upcoming film, you can restore the section. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 17:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding the unsourced "rumor" to the article. Putting it back in the article will be considered vandalism. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Menace II Society

Your additions regarding Mario Kassar/Carolco, Columbia Pictures, and Kim Fields' contributions to this film will continue to be reverted as long as you find proof of their involvement. Thank you.--Freshh (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an IMdB account Jevon? Sure looks like it:

"Columbia Pictures and Carolco Pictures acquire the rights to Menace II Society but their names were uncredited, leaving New Line Cinema as an independent producer for the movie."
"Jevon Tompkins, Kim Fields (also an writer), and Mario Kassar (also an producer) were actors on the film."
Cast: Mario Kassar-White Man at Hospital (uncredited) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.21.173 (talk) 01:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are seriously a borderline vandal. GET A LIFE, JEVON! SERIOUSLY! GET ONE NOW!--67.149.21.173 (talk) 23:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eazy-E, you will be blocked from editing. Pevernagie (talk) 10:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Castle Rock Entertainment, you will be blocked from editing. --Freshh (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carolco Pictures, you will be blocked from editing. --Freshh (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to N.W.A has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nelson Entertainment.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Nelson Entertainment.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:LloydAvery.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:LloydAvery.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lloydavery.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Lloydavery.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carolco1994Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carolco1994Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carolco1982Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carolco1982Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carolco1984Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carolco1984Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of Warner Bros. films. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Tlcleagcy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tlcleagcy.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stillcoolalbum.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stillcoolalbum.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Stillcool.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stillcool.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hip hop rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Boy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:DrDre-Detox 0 0 0x0 450x450.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:DrDre-Detox 0 0 0x0 450x450.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Tapout (song). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Cindy(need help?) 00:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tapout (song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Birdman and Bryan Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Chief Keef. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 23:53, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Drake (entertainer). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 01:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Enough Said, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 01:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to No Limit Forever Records, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. It is not that hard to provide a reliable source for your additions if it is true information. STATic message me! 04:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dwayne Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Police Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Nothing Was the Same, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 18:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jevon, in the future please do not ever use a forum as a reference or take information you have seen on a forum and add it to an encylopedia. Forums are probably the most unreliable place on the internet, only use reliable sources such as MTV, Billboard, Complex Magazine, XXL Magazine, various newspapers, HipHopDX, Rap-Up or other sites that meet WP:RS. Thank You. STATic message me! 21:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debra Antney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manager (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Stay Trippy, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 20:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Waka Flocka

Could you bother providing a link to it? Or better yet a reliable source that says he moved to Atlantic Records. And from now on sign your posts with four "~". Also something of note to you, I have a good feeling that User:12.119.116.50 is you, and as you probably know it was blocked. So after it is unblocked I suggest you only edit logged in on this account. If else all warnings will be directed towards this account, or a sockpuppetry case will be taken up. Thank you. STATic message me! 16:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I went on his Facebook and saw the picture so I changed it back. The only reason I questioned it was because as I remember his deal with Warner Bros. was not under the 1017 distribution deal originally. But it looks like his deal was moved over to Atlantic along with 1017 Brick Squad. STATic message me! 19:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PartyNextDoor

As of right now, you might want to just work on the main article and try to expand it and add some references. Because it probably would have been deleted if anyone else stumbled upon it first. STATic message me! 23:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nothing Was the Same (October 1)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nothing Was the Same.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 12:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jevon Tompkins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nothing Was the Same concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nothing Was the Same, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nothing Was the Same

Hello Jevon Tompkins. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Nothing Was the Same".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nothing Was the Same}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. STATic message me! 04:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jevon Tompkins. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, K. Michelle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 20:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plaza (singer)

I get what you're trying to say – but whether that is his real name or not, that isn't confirmation. It's an educated guess and that's not enough for a source. If you find something that specifically says Michael Kaminski is Plaza then go for it... Sixtrap (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lil Durk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jevon Tompkins. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 04:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 1017 Records, you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 19:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LIVEEntertainmentlogo1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LIVEEntertainmentlogo1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Charyn (2006), p. 96.
^ Charyn (2006), p. 96.

[1] Charyn (2006), p. 96.

[2] Charyn (2006), p. 96.

[1]

[2]