User talk:Jetwave Dave

Welcome!

Hello, Jetwave Dave, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Megapixie 22:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Firearms moves

You have a horrible habit of moving famous weapons without a disscusion of other wikipedia members. Moving things without a disscusion on a talk page will not stand with many cuminty members and will usaly be reverted. The changes you made to the M16 and AK47 pages are extremly popular pages and any moves made thier should have a disscuion. after viewing your controbutions i saw you moved some stub articlas or very short ones, these articals can usaly be changed without a disccusion. but to my origional point please start a disscusion weather or not the title you will change it to its actualy correct. its common courtesy to do so.(ForeverDEAD 02:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Your moves have been reverted by me or other wikipedians becuase of a lack of discusion.(ForeverDEAD 03:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Vandalism

Please read WP:3RR.Leibniz 20:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There!

Hi there!

Are you against the User:Parsecboy?, If so i will join up with you against him User:Jetwave Dave 04:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was resolved pretty much. I don't use Wikipedia that much anymore, somewhat because of the conflicts that exsist and somewhat because I've plain lost interest. Davidpdx 00:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pribor-3B

If you remove the AfD tag on the Pribor-3B article again, I will report you for disruptive editing. The article has been nominated for deletion, whether you like it or not. Thanks. Parsecboy 11:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont threaten me, DO IT YOU FAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. User:Jetwave Dave —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 15:14:00, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Done. Parsecboy 15:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You weren't blocked yet? Weird. Done. Bishonen | talk 17:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Redirect of Hand held nordenfelt gun

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hand held nordenfelt gun, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hand held nordenfelt gun is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hand held nordenfelt gun, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bgls poster.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bgls poster.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Intruder poster.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Intruder poster.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flammenwerfer M.16.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Flammenwerfer M.16., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Flammenwerfer M.16.. Marlith ^T/C 05:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Anita_Doth.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anita_Doth.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tromix Siamese .223

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tromix Siamese .223, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 12:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maxim Tokarev

I have nominated Maxim Tokarev, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxim Tokarev. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dorftrottel (troll) 11:14, May 2, 2008 11:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of IM Model 3 Combined Assault Rifle/SMG

I have nominated IM Model 3 Combined Assault Rifle/SMG, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IM Model 3 Combined Assault Rifle/SMG. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Third Reich last ditch weapons

Category:Third Reich last ditch weapons, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]