User talk:Jesuzfreak777

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:TheLetterM. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 01:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry man my computer is lagging a bit and I hit the wrong button. Dont take it personal its a bot message. - 4twenty42o (talk) 02:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced to multiple reliable sources.
No Sockpuppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Tan | 39 02:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added the above because your edits are not conforming to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please, please take a moment to familiarize yourself with the above information before making any more edits. Thanks! Tan | 39 02:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Tan | 39 02:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, I've noticed that you've been adding speedy deletion tags to Call of Duty 2 and I think you should check up on the Speedy deletion guidelines (when and how it should be used) here. — Oli ^OR Pyfan! 03:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battalion Nemesis

A tag has been placed on Battalion Nemesis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 03:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jesuzfreak777/Battalion Nemesis

I moved the beginning of the article here. Since you didn't yet have what Battalion Nemesis even is, the article is not ready for mainspace, but you can work on developing it in your user space. Let me know if you have any questions about this. LadyofShalott 03:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battalion Nemesis

The article Battalion Nemesis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable product

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 03:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Talk:Call of Duty 2, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 03:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jesuzfreak777. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
Message added 03:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Oli ^OR Pyfan! 03:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, disruptive, or otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to request an unblock, do not blank this page, and do not post fake "unblock granted" requests. The real issue is your vandalism, not your username. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jesuzfreak777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why is my account blocked because of my username. It only says "Jesuzfreak777" how is this inappropiate? I will tell everybody not to use Wiki because you can't use a username based on beliefs. This is wrong.My username is not innapropiate so why is my user page blcoked? This is ridiculous. "Jesuzfreak777" is not an innapropiate username!

Decline reason:

{{subst:Your block has nothing to do with your username. The reason, clearly stated, was your vandalism.}} LadyofShalott 04:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also posted copyrighted lyrics to the talk page. That last "article" made it plain that you aren't here to contribute. Ditto the messages on talk pages of other users, which makes me strongly suspect that you've been here before. PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]