User talk:Jesus Fan

Just to address your concerns about VirtualEye being treated unfairly, I would like to point you to [1] [2] [3] and [4]. Just food for thought. --Hojimachong^talk _con 17:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So do you have prove that Al-Qaida had carried out those attacks? --- ALM 18:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, actually, there is pretty solid evidence that Al-Qaeda carried out the attacks. Wikipedia is meant to present the truth, and it most sensible people agree upon that Al-Qaeda carried out the attacks. Not to imply that you are insensible, I have great respect for you, ALM. Al-Qaeda has also admitted to carrying out the attacks, in a 2004 video. Debate against that belongs at 9/11 Conspiracy Theories. --Hojimachong^talk _con 20:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me tell you that I am very mature and learned person. I sometimes write different articles in publications. You dont need to tell me what alqaeda is about. I simply dont buy what our media says. Few years ago I was also among those Americans who were fooled by the news media so easy. I was very upset and did not have any gratification in life and used to think moslems to be terrorists and haters. But then I started studying about them in detail and I studied literature and watched video lectures by the Americans who used to oppose American policies and used to support moslems in many ways. At first I thought they are traitors but more I learned the more I enlightened myslef. Now I know and think sometimes how fool I was to be so narrow-minded.

About virtualeye? I have seen the messages of virtualeye and acknowledged in my comment that he is not so civil and formal but he is very right in many ways and he is just being attacked by many people. I would rather ask virtualeye to use more civil remarks. I dont like his edits is some christian topics. If I look at his comments from my old perspective then he is not so convincing, but if I look at his comments from my current learned perspective then he is very much right and fair Jesus Fan 11:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Fan, my second comment was in response to ALM's comment. I was under the impression that you indeed know that Al-Qaeda committed the murders on 9/11. As for VirtualEye... his edits have become something like a broken record, repeating the same point over and over. I appreciate your contributions to the discussion on Talk:Muhammad, though. --Hojimachong^talk _con 17:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another obvious sockpuppet of VirtualEye.Proabivouac 05:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non insultarlo. what you mean? 8-| Jesus Fan 08:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Jesus Fan, may you please clarify this as why did you use similar comment 'a' while eidting? Please dont feel strange, I am being accused of sockpuppeting and need your response as urgent as possible. Thanks a lot for your understanding. VirtualEye 08:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry what do you mean by similar comment while editing? what is sockpuppeting? kindly explain Jesus Fan 13:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you edit an article, you have to give an edit summary. I commonly use a single letter comment 'a' in the text box of edit summary. Now I want to ask, why did you copy my method and you put an 'a' in the edit summary here. Why? I am asking because I am being accused of sock puppetry. Please understand that. Oh, and you can see what is sock puppetry.

VirtualEye 14:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Excuse me. I saw your edits and learn that you use character "a" in summary. Initially I thought the character "a" is mendatory if we do not write the summary of edits.I know it now from you it is not good? ok i will keep from the use of "a" at your request. LOL. Is it OK now? :-p Jesus Fan 04:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This "conversation" is hilarious. VirtualEye, why do you bother? You're not fooling anyone.Proabivouac 05:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is so funny pro..? Jesus Fan 16:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, when someone has a conversation with themselves and truly thinks that other users will not see the puppetry, it is sometimes considered humorous. You are discrediting yourself, VirtualEye. --Hojimachong^talk 17:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chong Are you baffled? Would you please shut up from impeaching me? I think i should use the similar impeachment on you. then you will understand how does it feel like. whadya say? Jesus Fan 07:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it is somewhat difficult to believe that you are not a sockpuppet due to the fact that your only edits to the Main: and Talk: were during VirtualEye's block. Since then, you have engaged in a silly argument here. --Hojimachong^talk 07:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]