User talk:Jessienmsnyder

This user is a student editor in Wilfrid_Laurier_University/Capstone_in_Student_Affairs_(Winter_2020) .

Welcome!

Hello, Jessienmsnyder, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Residential Curriculum (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AntiCompositeNumber were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is a lot of jargon and promotional phrases in this draft. The draft also relies on citations to non-independent sources, which don't show the notability of the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Residential Curriculum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Residential Curriculum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jessienmsnyder! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Residential Curriculum (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As per the last reviewers comments

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Residential Curriculum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Residential Curriculum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Residential Curriculum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Residential Curriculum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Praxidicae:. It looks like two different versions were created at different capitalizations. I've deleted one and moved the other back to the student's userspace. Jessienmsnyder, I have some notes for you, which I'll leave in a separate section. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Shalor. I'd really like to see some guidance given to students writing in this area about not using specific sellers (or "motivational speakers"). If it had been anything other than a student, I'd have requested a spamblock as this is what we typically see from SEO spammers. Praxidicae (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make a note of this and review our training modules to see what can be added or emphasized. I do want to work on improving our training coverage of sourcing, to be sure. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Hi! I have some notes:

This needs more coverage to establish how this is a notable topic. When finding sources, make sure that you're using the strongest possible reliable sources.

For example, this is essentially a self-published blog, which poses issues of verification and reliability since we can't guarantee the amount of editorial oversight. It also doesn't help that the site is aimed at selling services to the reader and links frequently to the services or to places that would sell or talk up the services, which poses an issue of neutrality.

Some of the sourcing were studies - this poses an issue because a study is a primary source for any of the claims and research conducted by its authors, who are almost always the ones who conducted the research. The publisher doesn't actually do any in-depth verification of the study or provide commentary - they only look to make sure that there is nothing in the study that immediately invalidates it. There are also additional issues around context, as studies are limited out of necessity and as such, we can't guarantee that what is true for one group would be true for all. Others looked to be primary sources in that they were people reviewing the efficiency of a residential curriculum that they have ties to in one way or another.

This is a notification of an event, which poses issues of it being in-depth. I also don't see where the term residential curriculum is used in the source. It mentions a curricular approach but doesn't specify residential curriculum as far as I can tell at first glance. Keep in mind that using a source that doesn't mention residential curriculum to back up claims about the topic can be seen as original research.

With the draft, avoid listing examples unless they're highlighted in independent and reliable sources, otherwise it can run the risk of being seen as promotional.

Something else about the draft - be cautious with detail. For example, the 10 Essential Elements was written in a way that comes across like we're trying to talk up the virtues of a residential curriculum. I think that if it were summarized more, this could be resolved, so I think it would be better to just have a simple list accompanied by a paragraph that summarizes what these elements are supposed to accomplish.

I think that this covers some of the basics, let me know if you have any questions by responding on my talk page or by responding here with this tag (minus the nowiki tags) {{ping|Shalor (Wiki Ed)}}. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Residential Curriculum concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Residential Curriculum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Residential Curriculum

Hello, Jessienmsnyder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Residential Curriculum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Residential curriculum

Hello, Jessienmsnyder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Residential curriculum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]