User talk:JessicaRozycki

Speedy deletion nomination of Jorge Valencia (Nonprofit Executive)

Hello JessicaRozycki,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jorge Valencia (Nonprofit Executive) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

GMG ^talk 19:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you want to rewrite an article in your own words without that article being deleted in the future, please use a Sandbox. Thank you.--Biografer (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of employment

Hello JessicaRozycki. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JessicaRozycki. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JessicaRozycki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jorge Valencia (Nonprofit Executive)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jorge Valencia (Nonprofit Executive) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Press releases and social media are never considered reliable sources, as they contain content created by the subject. We require multiple independent sources with established reputations for fact-checking and editorial oversight for a subject to be considered notable enough for inclusion. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid edits

Hell again. You have also made edits to Point Foundation (LGBT) but you have not disclosed this on your userpage. Please include on your userpage disclosure the titles of all articles you have been paid to edit: {{paid|employer=ACME|userbox=yes|list=yes|articles= * [[A]] * [[B]] * [[C]] * [[D]] }}

Where A, B, etc. are the article titles. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]