User talk:Jerseyjack21
November 2008
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Booker T. Washington. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 20:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jack trib requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Magic.Wiki 18:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jack trib requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DanielRigal (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 19:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Fabrictramp- We'd love to have you come back from your block as a productive contributor. You might want to take this time to read WP:FIRST and WP:CIVIL to get some ideas on what a good contribution is and how to communicate to other editors. HTH.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chicago White Sox, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chicago White Sox was changed by Jerseyjack21 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-03T17:43:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
You've already been blocked once for vandalism. Continue to vandalize and you will be blocked again.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:25, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
blocked
[edit]Indefinitely blocked, Tom Harrison Talk 23:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)