User talk:Jerry Steinfield

Welcome!

Hello, Jerry Steinfield! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started

Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset
How to: edit a page • upload an image

Getting Help

Frequently Asked Questions
Directories and indexes
Where to: ask questions • make requests
Tip of the day
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Jackson Rogers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jackson Rogers, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:13, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Jackson Rogers Article

I have not deleted the Jackson Rogers article but have moved it to Draft:Jackson Rogers because it appeared to be unsourced & for biographical articles sourcing is very pertinent so please before moving it back to mainspace ensure to add least three reliable sources, if you any further questions ensure to come to my talk page & ask me whatever you feel like asking. I am also available to provide guidance for you if you are need of any. Cheers. Celestina007 (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jackson Rogers

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Jackson Rogers, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It is an "attack page", (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 10:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok boomer Jerry Steinfield (talk) 05:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jackson Rogers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jackson Rogers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Majavah ^(t/c) 06:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok boomer Jerry Steinfield (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Majavah read the talk page.

I need a deletion of the headline title. Their are to of the and it’s getting out of hand. Please don’t delete all the page just the initial headings. I have added additional links for citation.  Jerry Steinfield (talk) 07:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Braden Gregory

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Braden Gregory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

?Hey this person is a famous YouTuber from this city. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 12:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this page is valid why are you deleting it. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Braden Gregory

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Braden Gregory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sand Springs, Oklahoma, you may be blocked from editing. Daiyusha (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability in 2020 article

Your edit to the article 2020 has been reverted. Add only events with significant international coverage. Do not add events that are solely domestic. Your 18.3 C temperature inn Argentina has no notability. It has broken no records. Unless its the hottest temperature recorded like in 56.7 °C in 10 July 1913 in Furnace Creek US or the coldest −89.2 °C in Antarctica in 1983 it is not notable, clearly a domestic event and violation of Wikipedia:Recentism. Your contribution is highly respected but please only add events that are internationally notable in the 2020 article and do not add purely domestic events. Dilbaggg (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Argentina thing was not mine and I posted the thing of the Super Bowl which is understandable if it was taken down because it only applies to the US. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 23:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, my mistake, sorry. Dilbaggg (talk) 00:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 01:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the block

Hi, the reason for your block was that you were repeatedly creating articles about non-famous people, and you did that even after repeated warnings.

Regarding your use of violent words, you were 'only' given a temporary talk page ban, which i see is not applicable anymore.

Tbe first amendment is not completely applicable on this site though, you can see Wikipedia: Free Speech for more details. Daiyusha (talk) 08:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thorough ban. I understand the implications and action that could lead to a ban. I apologize for the actions and thank you for a temporary ban. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 03:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clyde Boyd Middle School (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clyde Boyd Middle School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clyde Boyd Middle School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jerry Steinfield! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 06:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User:Jackson3423123, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Xbox Series X. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TurboSonic (talk) 04:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was the talk page. I’m just cheering up the mood a little bit. Just Lighten things up because it’s a talk page. Come on have a little fun I mean it’s clearly not vandalism type (unless Wikipedia defines it that way). Jerry Steinfield (talk) 05:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment didn't really add anything to the talk page and I don't think anyone would have cared if I kept it there. TurboSonic (talk) 14:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thats the point no one cares. But okay i'll be more considered to the talk page.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Elizium23 (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Tulsa Fire Department. Elizium23 (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is that inappropriate I added it where United States was linked to the country so it could be clicked. I’ve seen that when it says the US it links to the US with the flag there. So I don’t understand your reasoning why it is not acceptable. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 00:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Steinfield, WP:INFOBOXFLAG explains why we do not place flags in infoboxes. Elizium23 (talk) 00:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do appreciate the link about why but that doesn’t necessarily solve it. I mean what about city flag, state flags, county flags I can only see that the example shows countries I do not understand the full concept of it being a mere “distraction”, but I’ll obey the guidelines of Wikipedia. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 00:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also this constitutes as May from Wikipedia so do not post in this area Jerry Steinfield (talk) 01:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jerry Steinfield, strange messages like this one, or the one at the top of your talk page, indicate severe communication issues between other editors and you. There is no right to free speech on Wikipedia, the discussion started in April, and there is no requirement to sort talk page messages by date. We encourage every editor to be bold. However, the patience of the community is limited. I'm not sure what I can suggest: Please make less mistakes? You're acting in good faith, but it often seems to go wrong. I'm not sure if you can solve this problem at all, but if it persists, I'm afraid a block for disruptive editing may reoccur. Is it the language, perhaps? Then see meta:List of Wikipedias, please. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While I was typing, Special:Diff/954167424 happened. I'd say "Come on, please use your common sense", but perhaps that's the problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you I speak English same as the rest of the words on the talk page. And okay the communication started 2 minutes before 2 freaking minutes. Okay I’ll as admit it was April 30 when they conversation started. I am a new editor so I make mistakes and I try to do what I can but most times I get warned for something that I didn’t know was against the guidelines of Wikipedia. It is very complicated, but I thank you for trying to reassure some things. I’ve been bombarded by several people in my time on Wikipedia and it’s seems like they don’t necessarily understand that my edits are either in good faith or are minor mistakes. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 01:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Steinfield, you would have my sympathies, but Special:Diff/934968581 (your first message here), Special:Diff/938286435 (your second message here), Special:Diff/938281648 (your third message here) and Special:Diff/938334134/Special:Diff/938334283 (your reaction to the previous block) as well as other edits on other pages put you in a tough position to complain about other users' behavior. So I'm afraid you'll have to accept the warnings; there is no "newbie bonus" left. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree I have made mistakes in the past but I wish I could take it all away, but who wouldn’t. I do not intend vandalism as i just won’t to help the community. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are allowed to remove all messages from this talk page (see WP:BLANKING), perhaps to symbolize a clean start. I recommend using a friendly edit summary when doing so, to explain that you're not doing this because you're upset, but rather because you understand the past mistakes and would like to archive these bad memories. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, Thanks! Jerry Steinfield (talk) 02:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:572 Area Code

Hello, Jerry Steinfield. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "572 Area Code".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yah I made that submission along time ago. I had an interest in it then but I have moved on to other projects now and wish not to continue with that. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I don’t see any direct violations of copyright, the website itself seems like something I could sight. The information is true, and I’m not sure why you’d want to suppress it but ok. Quite possibly I could try and contact the owner of the website and ask for permission to use the information. From their copyright page “All content © 2006-2021 Sand Springs, OK and its representatives. All rights reserved.” Jerry Steinfield (talk) 18:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bold headings

Thanks for your edits to Tulsa. However section titles should not be in bold, so I'm going to undo that part. That's all. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 05:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i understand that they shouldn’t be bolded, but they are sub heading (well a sub heading within a sub heading). Not to sound too opinionated, but the alternative of leaving it as is seems to lack the emphasis that it’s an inner section of the main section. There should be some selection to differentiate the sections from the main portion of the section. The lettering is the same font size as the words within the passage, so there is no distinct part between the title and the information. While i’ll agree their that the bold should no longer be needed a do i suggest their should be some kind of fix to this situation. Just a suggestion, and thanks for the calm correction Jerry Steinfield (talk) 06:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To me, those headings already look bold by default, and I don't think bolding them even changes how they look at all. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 14:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that was a from a certain point of view thing because it seemed to be the opposite for me at least. But yes i understand your thoughts on the bolding Jerry Steinfield (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the mobile website appears how you are describing. This affects all Wikipedia articles and you might want to bring it up at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) for further discussion. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 17:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jerry Steinfield (talk) 22:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SmartLess, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Courtney Cox. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 11:24, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

US Senators

Howdy. I think I repaired the rest of the "serving with" content, in all the other current US Senators bio infoboxes. Imagine the damage, if those additions were put in the current US Representatives bio infoboxes? GoodDay (talk) 04:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Canadian County, Oklahoma

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Canadian County, Oklahoma, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Canadian County, Oklahoma

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Canadian County, Oklahoma, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]