User talk:Jerodd

I'm Joshua Rodd, currently in Weems, Ohio. I occasionally edit articles on Wikipedia. You can reach me at joshua@rodd.us.

Pastebin

See WP:EL. I'd replace all those links with a link to the Open Directory Project page on pastebins, if there is one. Dylan Lake (t·c·ε) 16:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Good catch

Good catch on that Marc Chagall vandalism. I was like... "wait what?" and it was corrected a second later. Keep up the good work! _{TIM KLOSKE|TALK} 15:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Mark Chagall

Okay, first of all, I didn't, repeat didn't, vandalise Mark Chagall's page, I only hyperlinked his nationalities. Secondly, I don't care for your patronising tone.

By the way, cheers for removing the aforementioned hyperlinks. REAL constructive...

--6afraidof7 (talk) 16:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Uhh.. you added the following text: "and pornographic actress", and changed the following sentence from 'he' to 'she'. I like to assume good faith, but the diff right here shows exactly what you added to the article, which was clearly vandalism. So.. saying that you didn't is, well, disingenuous at best. Prince of Canada ^{t | c} 18:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Virtual Pharmacies

I had trouble creating a proper looking list of references. I wanted them to be displayed correctly but could not figure it out they kept coming as a line source 1, source 2 source 3 etc. Instead of

Source 1 Source 2 Source 3

Also regarding the external links, they were simply there to provide readers with examples of legit virtual pharmacies to prevent shoppers from being scammed since there are so many of them that break US or international laws, and many more that steal consumers money.

I also could not figure out how to make that list look proper either.

If I had too many examples that's no problem with me I can cut the list down to two or three very legit networks. If you would be so kind as to can give me a little direction as to how to make the references section look correct, I'd like to add them back since they were legit references I took information from. Also if the external links section was a bad idea, should I create a section that says SAFE Virtual Pharmacies or something of that sort? I mean the main reason I made this page was to help people from being ripped off like my poor 62 year old mother did by an off shore pharmacy in India.

I also have this page on my watchlist, so I can be sure to help remove any "spam" links that are added.

Thanks,

Derickson82 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Derickson82 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Talk Page

Since when was it any of your damn business what I do with the discussion on my talk page? Not that I have to justify myself to you, but the reason I removed it all was because I'd been receiving hate mail.

--6afraidof7 (talk) 16:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Marc Chagall

This matter was cleared up months ago, why are you bothering me with it again? And yes, I did remove those entries on my talk page, sorry if I broke some rule by doing that but I felt they were incorrect, and thus painted an unfair picture of me as a vandal, which I am not. --Heslopian (talk) 21:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

As another user noted above, you vandalised the page by changing "he" to "she" and referring to Marc Chagall as a "pornographic actress". The diff here here shows your changes. Are you claiming someone else used your account? Joshua (talk) 23:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

That seems to me to be the only feasible explanation. To be honest, this whole situation has now grown tedious in the extreme; there are only so many times I can be bothered to protest my innocence. If you think I vandalised the article, fine, I really don't care anymore, especially as my records will undoubtedly show that I am a generally very productive user. If for some reason you want to continue this pointless argument, be warned that I won't respond to any more messages on the subject and will probably delete your edits to my talk page. Thank you. --Heslopian (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frontline Ministries International

The article Frontline Ministries International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no notability is presented

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. only (talk) 02:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)