User talk:Jerdobias

Chicken picatta!!!

Rob T Firefly 04:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OMG PIE!!!

DO U HAVE NE PIE LINEAR?? --Murd0c516 12:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging Flowerhead

You tagged the article for cleanup. I don't understand, I wrote most of this based on the style of similar articles. Feel free to make suggestions or edits in order to assist me become a better member of the wikipedia community, but I still don't understand what you mean after reading the manual of style. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eschmitz (talk • contribs) 01:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Request for Comment

I have placed a request for comment under the Politics section regarding the issue of including the city blocks to medical marijuana dispensaries. The full RfC discussion is on the city of Ontario's talk page (since there was a related comment there). Please feel free to add your comments. Hopefully a third party can help with input. --theSpectator _talk 20:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Chrisclavin.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chrisclavin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 14:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holden McNeil

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Holden McNeil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable character. Merge to either the movie articles or the actor article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holden McNeil

Major lead in character isn't a factor as to whether he should get his own article or not. It's content, out of universe information. McNeil's article currently has none and fits much better on a "characters" page. Similar to why Alyssa Jones redirects into Chasing Amy even though she too is a major character. The big article is not just about "minor charcters" but all View Askewniverse characters. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be expanded, certainly, but merging seems unnecessary. there's just as much info about Holden as there is Banky Edwards, who is a more minor character yet still has his own (deserved) page. i think a cleanup/expansion tag would work, merging doesn't seem appropriate. jer the linear (talk) 13:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was planning on tackling most of the separate View Askewniverse character articles in due time, since all of them consist entirely of plot material that could be compressed and summarized. In any case, I favor a "merge now and spin out of necessary" sort of method, prefer only to spin out when enough out of universe content is demonstrated. Thoughts? hbdragon88 (talk) 16:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, sounds fair enough. I'm not emotionally invested enough in it to argue against it. If you feel that's more appropriate, I'll concede. Let me know if you need any help, I was planning on some expansion of a lot of those characters and better citations. jer the linear (talk) 01:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Holden McNeil

I have nominated Holden McNeil, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holden McNeil. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neelix (talk) 18:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Unitedphonelosers.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Unitedphonelosers.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 21:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a creative commons license declaration at the bottom of every phonelosers.net page. i will also send in the OTRS letter, but the action is not necessary since the image is already released under CC. This type of thing should be verified before tagging images for deletion. jer the linear (talk) 17:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jerdobias. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dave Roberts (outfielder), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmoore5556 (talk • contribs) 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Ouch.

Please do not rearrange the furniture in my room, as you did when you snuck into my home, without citing a reliable source and letting me know so I won't stub my toe on a new chair when getting up in the middle of the night to use the sanitary facility. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to stay the hell out of my house. Thank you. Rob T Firefly (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Anti-Creative Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Anti-Creative Logo.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User category proposed deletion

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:26, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]