User talk:Jeongseok victor Lee

Welcome!

Hello, Jeongseok victor Lee, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

There are a few references that aren't fully formatted (e.g., one has a red error link) but otherwise I think it looks really good. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A proposition for you

I came across your recently created article Irene Sue Vernon. It currently does not meet the standards for inclusion on Wikipedia. I thought I would offer you the option to move it back to your sandbox to continue working on it. The other option is to nominate it for deletion. I'll be watching this talk page so feel free to respond here. Primefac (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell me which part does not meet the standards please?Jeongseok victor Lee (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Primarily the fact that you have almost no independent reliable sources that discuss Vernon in any detail. This is the primary metric of the Golden Rule for determining notability. There is also WP:PROF, an additional set of criteria for professors and academics, which she does not appear to meet at this point in time.

Additionally, the page relies too heavily on PRIMARY sources such as her own writings. We do not need to provide a reference to every article or piece she has written. Primefac (talk) 19:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your opinion. What you are saying seems reasonable. I will talk to the issue with other authors as soon as possible.Jeongseok victor Lee (talk) 20:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Irene Sue Vernon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irene Sue Vernon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Sue Vernon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 01:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Holocaust and Religious Minorities Museum draft

I moved your Draft to User:Jeongseok victor Lee/Center for Studies of the Holocaust and Religious Minorities Museum from the Article space. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 12:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Irene Sue Vernon) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Irene Sue Vernon, Jeongseok victor Lee!

Wikipedia editor Velella just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Already at AfD and tagged with multiple issues. No further tagging would induce any improvement to a poor article

To reply, leave a comment on Velella's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

File permission problem with File:Irene Vernon.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Irene Vernon.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]