User talk:Jenny MacKinnon

Welcome!

Hello, Jenny MacKinnon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 09:05, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

Melbourne Meetup

Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus
Previous: 25 November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

"Number" in opera

Hi Jenny: While I live in the US, I'm British and don't particularly like the use of the US-centric "number" when it comes to opera, although there's a perfectly logical reason for doing so in certain cases and with certain types of operas as we see from the Wiki article linked.

I specialise in writing about bel canto era operas, but always use "Aria" or, more specifically where there is a clear two-part (cavatina + cabaletta) or three-part format (cavatina + temp di mezzo + cabaletta).

One of the group's long-term aims is to integrate any section which simply lists "numbers" or "principal numbers" (or some such name) into the synopsis, thus indicating where they occur in the dramatic context. This seems to make much more sense. All the best, Viva-Verdi (talk) 09:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Just noticed: you've been around Wikipedia almost exactly the same length of time that I have! Viva-Verdi (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Viva-Verdi,

Thanks for that update. It's so nice to see people editing in constructive, long-term way rather than hodge podge. Just before I saw your message, I noticed a plot synopsis for a famous story which, due to its brevity and lack of insight, would lead the average reader into assuming the story means A when it in fact means B, if one is to read it fully.

It's such a challenge to explain 'worlds' to people who haven't experienced them, without changing the 'world' with our words. How do you write passionately without losing balance? It's the same tension that we love between score and libretto, I guess.

And I'm an editor by trade - I know there are as many Englishes as there are English-speakers.Jenny MacKinnon (talk) 13:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]