User talk:JenniferJaacks

JenniferJaacks, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi JenniferJaacks!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Broaster Company because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Broaster Company. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Fraggle81 (talk) 20:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 17 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Assurance page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm PamD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Assurance without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In creating a page about one company you destroyed a long-established disambiguation page. I have reverted your edits. If you wish to create an article about the company, please use an appropriate different title. Thank you. PamD 10:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Assurance Agency

Hello JenniferJaacks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Assurance Agency for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —Swpb^talk 20:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assurance Agency

The statements may be sourced; they are also universally glowing. Wikipedia strives for a neutral point of view. The page you created does little more than heap praise on this company (perhaps every positive thing that has ever been said about it in print). —Swpb^talk 20:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JenniferJaacks. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Assurance Agency, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. PamD 21:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any relationship with the Assurance Agency which would cause a Conflict of Interest as described above? PamD 21:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also have to question your affiliation, as a search for your name (going by your username) brings up results that heavily suggests that you're a PR/marketing person. Edits like this one, paired with the Assurance article, also strongly give off the impression that you (or rather your company) was hired to edit Wikipedia to raise a company's Internet profile. Now I'm aware that you claim on Pam's page that you are not affiliated, but your edits still give off the above impression. Keep in mind that working for a separate company is still seen as a conflict of interest if your company is being paid to write about someone else. Even if by some chance you aren't affiliated, promotional edits are still not considered to be appropriate on Wikipedia and if it's suspected that you are hiding an affiliation, it's possible that you could be blocked from editing for not disclosing this. Someone can still edit if they have a COI, but you need to disclose this and it's recommended that you not make any direct edits to an article or that you only create articles via AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assurance Agency (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Assurance Agency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Assurance Agency concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Assurance Agency, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Assurance Agency

Hello, JenniferJaacks. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Assurance Agency".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 14:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]