User talk:JenniferForUnity

Welcome!

Hello, JenniferForUnity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Gray Porpoise 02:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Logo on your talk page

Hi Jennifer - welcome to Wikipedia! Just wanted to let you know that I've deleted the wiki logo you had on your user page, because you indicated that only Wikipedia has permission to use this file. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, since explicit permission to use it was given, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with this restriction on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it.

If you created this media file and want it to be kept on Wikipedia, re-upload it stating {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 11:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You edited my user page to get rid of an image that was "permission given for wikipedia" but not "properly licensed". Thanks for the heads up. I didn't realize there was a difference and I do now thanks to you (and now the image is properly licensed). I just wanted to say thanks for putting in the effort :-) - JenniferForUnity 20:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not a problem - I'm glad you've now chosen to relicense the image! cheers, _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 07:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A comment

Hello Jennifer. You might consider deleting the article, Minnesota 8th congressional district election, 2006. The article seems to have served the purpose you intended and now with the elcetion over is just an incompete article taking up wiki space. Thanks for considering it. Johnn 7 07:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your inquiry

Thanks for noticing my edits. I do quite a bit of spelling correction when my attention is divided. Otherwise I write about Minnesota history, places, or people. I've also spent time today working on the God-awful article Renewable fuels (I'm not done yet). I'll add you to my LJ friends if you'd like. I didn't find JenniferForUnity there; what do you go by? Appraiser 02:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC) aka bchbum_98.[reply]

LiveJournal doesn't like long logins... http://jenforunity.livejournal.com/ :-)

- JenniferForUnity 05:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Election Reform

Dear JenniferForUnity,

you wrote:

My biggest issue is election reform, specifically things like Ranked Pairs Polling and the Comparison of Pairs of Outcomes by the Single Transferable Vote (which can be implemented to accomplish a Proportional representation version of Ranked Pairs).

What do you think about the Schulze method [1] [2] [3]? Markus Schulze 22:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

spam link ☹

Just to let you know that unitysupporters.com, which you link to on your user page, has been taken over by a spam site. ☹ Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 12:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minnesota's 8th congressional district election, 2006 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minnesota's 8th congressional district election, 2006 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota's 8th congressional district election, 2006 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JayJay^{Talk to me} 02:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]