User talk:Jennifer.cerer/sandbox

Peer Review

I think overall the content of the article looks good, all the article needs is the organizational aspects. The biggest thing to do is the divisions of sections, I see that you have Day 3, 4 and 5 in your outline. I think that would be a good way to divide a section with sub-headers as the days, adequately splitting the article into readable sections. Perhaps start with the background of the Convention itself and then go into the turmoil that occurred. Klayk (talk) 20:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy the content and detail of your article, as well as your sources. However, I was a bit thrown off from the lack of headings for each sectionNicoleelkins (talk) 20:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really well researched and written. You may consider adding internal links to pages such as the Revolutionary Youth Movement and the 1968 Democratic National Convention.You have a lot of great info and this may help users get even more information. Bankstonad (talk) 03:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have a great start to your article, with a good amount of detail. Formatting, with headers and sub-headers would be a place for improvement. IndigoSpranger (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly care deeply about your topic--I think 1969 SDS convention is deserving of a Wikipedia page. The addition of headings and subheadings etc. will provide the article with a much needed structure. I agree, that the addition of hyperlinks would be useful. Make sure to properly cite your sources (I can help you navigate the visual editor if you need help. Goldsteinmj (talk) 21:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very well done. I think that your article is definitely on the right path. Doing the formal structure (heading, sub-heading, references, etc.) would be good. I appreciate the use of impromptu in-text citations so that your peers can see where your material is actually coming from. Haassr (talk) 22:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]