User talk:Jennacarleton

This user is a student editor in Carleton_University/ERTH_4303_Resources_of_the_Earth_(Spring) .

Jennacarleton, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jennacarleton! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Jennacarleton, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Open-pit Mining Feedback

Hi, I am just completing the user feedback for your chosen article on Open-pit mining. From using the peer review checklist overall the article meets all the criteria. Everything in the article was relevant to the topic. The article is neutral and no viewpoints are (un)overrepresented. However, a few links cannot be reached, I will list them based on reference number: 10 (page not found) and 11. Most articles are up to date throughout the page. Some simple formatting such as spacing between sentences should be fixed. In the second last paragraph of 'Description' a sentence can be broken into two. Sentences could use some editing to create better flow of information. However, the article so far sounds good! Taylorbenda (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]