User talk:Jennabalzer
Speedy deletion nomination of Richmond SPCA
[edit]Hello Jennabalzer,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Richmond SPCA for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 17:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Jennabalzer/sandbox
[edit]Hello, Jennabalzer. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
The article Richmond SPCA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. I'm just not finding any real coverage beyond the usual directories, advocacy links, and local news "please help our shelter" news coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Normal Op (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Richmond SPCA for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richmond SPCA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond SPCA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Normal Op (talk) 05:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)