User talk:JemSt0ne16

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, JemSt0ne16! Thank you for your contributions. I am KGirlTrucker81 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 02:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Claire mccaskill official photo 113 congress.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Claire mccaskill official photo 113 congress.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Claire mccaskill official photo 113 congress.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Claire mccaskill official photo 113 congress.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I would like to explain my removal of your edit on George W. Bush

Now I never like too remove edits without properly discussing them with the person who originally typed it, that's why I'm leaving my reasoning here where you can properly read it. While I feel it is an important piece of information to include in the article, I feel it doesn't belong within the lead, as it doesn't involve George W. Bush the man as much as Donald Trump and his campaign. I'd love to see it put in a suitable location elsewhere within the article of course, but not in the lead especially in front of his historical Presidential ranking which neatly caps off his Presidency. Have a fantastic day. Archer Rafferty (talk) 2:07, December 28 2016 —Preceding undated comment added 14:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

awe

Cain242 (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]