User talk:Jem87

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to List of terrorist incidents 2014 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of terrorist incidents 2014 was changed by Jem87 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853999 on 2014-01-01T23:26:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jem87, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Jem87! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

@Jem, just wanted to notify you i had an edit-conflict while editing List of ongoing armed conflicts. I had made a large scale revert to another user, but most of your edits were later restored. Please continue to contribute to the article.GreyShark (dibra) 10:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jem, one more thing, which would make your edits more helpful: when you edit the conflicts page (like here), please remember also to update the {{ntsh|xx}} field, where xx is the low estimation of the casualties. Thanks!GreyShark (dibra) 18:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahmoudiyah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanaa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Jem87, i notice that you haven't yet received a formal greeting on behalf of veteran editors, so welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! GreyShark (dibra) 18:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using sources

First of all, thanks for your good work on List of ongoing armed conflicts article. I would like however to clarify that in wikipedia it is forbidden to use wikipedia articles as sources, like you did in this edit. It is also forbidden to use self-published information, personal blogs and sites which cannot be verified. Generally, mass-media sources (specifically those with editorial board like CNN, BBC, ABC, etc.), academic sources (universities and works published by scholars), government or official data sources (like ministries and institutes) are considered reliable. It is also important to note that many users confuse reliable sources and POV sources - reliable source can be POV (as long as it is verified, or in case of media has an editorial board) and still has a place on wikipedia. For more information see WP:RS.GreyShark (dibra) 20:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surobi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kristijh

The terrorist attacks in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan should be removed from List of terrorist incidents, 2014 and moved to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2014, Terrorist incidents in Iraq in 2014 and the Terrorist incidents in Afghanistan in 2014

I won't revert you, but ..

.. please be more careful about the spellings of the words "Shite" and "Shiite". Philip Trueman (talk) 13:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Western (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]