User talk:Jelotan

This user is a student editor in Columbia_College_Chicago/Equitable_Futures_-_Internet_Cultures_and_Open_Access_(Spring_2023) .

Welcome!

Hello, Jelotan, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creativity and mental health

Hi @Jelotan and WikiEdit7205: You selected to edit the creativity and mental health article. Bear in mind that you are editing medical-related content. As such, you need to pay very careful attention to the sources that you are using. I recommend that you complete the Editing health and psychology topics training module, and have a look at the reliable sourcing guidelines for medical articles before editing the live Wikipedia articles further. This is important. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Brianda (Wiki Ed) thank you so much for reaching out I'll be sure to complete the training module and look at the sourcing guide. I'll make sure to research thoroughly and update on my sandbox before making any changes. If I don't think I'm able to improve the article I'll make sure not to touch the actual article. Thank you again. Jelotan (talk) 21:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter article

Hi @Jelotan:, Thanks for reading the message I left above. I see that you've chosen the Twitter article now. Unfortunately that has its own set concerns because it is a Good Article, which means that it is among Wikipedia's best work. While there might be room to make a few small improvements to Good Articles, they are going to be more complete, overall, and harder to work on as your first major contribution to Wikipedia. If you take a look at the talk page, the article was recently reassessed as a good article, and for that reason, I recommend that you pick a different article to work on - one that has scope for improvement. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Brianda (Wiki Ed), understood. I'll look at the article for examples of what makes and article good but I'll remove it from my list of editing articles. Jelotan (talk) 22:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rotoscoped horse

I don't think the mere outline animation gives the correct impression of traditional animation - therefore I reverted your edit. If you can make a more typical example of traditional animation, you can upload that instead. Janke | Talk 11:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]