User talk:Jellyfish82

Agreeable edit. Kudos.

September 2017

Hello Jellyfish82. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Hokushin Ittō-ryū, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Bakilas (talk) 11:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. I did not know how to do this. Jellyfish82 (talk) 11:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it makes it a bit easier to keep track of conversations. Bakilas (talk) 11:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hokushin Ittō-ryū. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bakilas (talk) 12:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bakilas He is involved in an edit war. I want this to end. Please read the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hokushin_Itt%C5%8D-ry%C5%AB talk section. 14.132.3.250 (talk) 13:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bakilas 14.132.3.250 started an editing war back in 2015 on the same page and was blocked from wiki users. Now he was unblocked and restarted defaming the Chiba-Dojo line. As he does not provide any proof for his claims, I request that he is blocked again. Jellyfish82 (talk) 14:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14.132.3.250 & Jellyfish82, who started the edit war isn't super important. What matters is that you both engaged in it. I strongly advise sorting things out on the article talk page instead of constantly reverting each other. If you are unable to come to an agreement there I advise looking into dispute resolution because if things continue the way they have been you both run the risk of getting blocked. Bakilas (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bakilas As you can see on the talk page of the other user, I think we found an agreement and the editing war is over. Jellyfish82 (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Happy editing. Bakilas (talk) 08:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Your recent editing history at Hokushin Ittō-ryū shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your edit war with 14.132.3.250 has resumed. Do not make further edits to Hokushin Ittō-ryū without arriving at a consensus. I'd suggest both users request assistance a third opinion or seek dispute resolution. Operator873^CONNECT 03:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Unagidon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia, and all edits made in violation of a block or ban may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Alex Shih ^Talk 04:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you are using multiple accounts to evade the warning of conflict of interest. Please note that illegitimate use of multiple accounts is against the policies. Alex Shih ^Talk 04:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jellyfish82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request that my account is unblocked. All I did was trying to stop online defamation. The other account was from my other PC at work. I apologize for this. I won't use Unagidon anymore. However my only intention was to stop online defamation which is based on the claims of a person who seems to have serious problems with this certain hokushin itto-ryu line. He does not use any sources and claims that this line is recreated and fake. I provided examples of how other Ryuha handle it the same way, but the other person ignores everything and keeps on defaming Mr. Otsuka and his school without providing proof, saying his word is enough. Statements like, they bought titles etc. are used frequently. Was he there? From where does he know what happened? Wikipedia is not a place to defame people. Jellyfish82 (talk) 12:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am correcting the formatting of your unblock request. You missed out the {{ and }}. If I had not happened to come along and see this, it is likely that no administrator would ever have seen your request, as it would not have been added to the list of unblock requests that administrators check. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation

You say you were reverting defamation. Can your provide the dif's? All I saw was a tedious, run of the mill edit war between you and another blocked user.Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]