User talk:Jellychichi

Nomination of Kevin L. Tan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin L. Tan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin L. Tan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 01:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Zaid Zayd per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zaid Zayd. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jellychichi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet. I understand that the page I created didn't have enough sources and I will do better next time. It was my first attempt at page creation as I noticed this person who is notable in my country didn't have a page. Jellychichi (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me that you are completely unrelated to the other accounts. For example, it seems more likely to me that you were hired to create that article. Yamla (talk) 13:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As for the article itself, I used excerpts from the sources as I thought that was the common practice. I am sorry if it seemed promotional and I will do my best to write more neutral as a reporting of the source(s). Jellychichi (talk) 12:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to check my IP address and my email account? I am a student using my .edu email from my university, and my IP should be able to identify me as completely different from that spammer. Anyway, if it would help, I will steer clear of any articles related to the subject and Megaworld. I sincerely apologize for the trouble. Jellychichi (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

UTRS appeal #43456 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]