User talk:JellyBaby1

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Before you leave a message, please read the following.

If you have left me a message on your talk page then it means I am watching it, meaning I will reply there rather than here
If you leave a message here then I will reply here
I watch my talk page often, any unconstructive edits will be deleted.
Discussions that have finished may be archived by Lowercase sigmabot III or by me. Archives are below

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of AH999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JellyBaby1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet so why have i been blocked JellyBaby1 (talk) 15:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Multiple people are convinced you are. Yamla (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JellyBaby1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here i am new here and idont even know who ah999 is, please unblock me

Decline reason:

Obvious sock is obvious. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given that you are now block evading under an IP address, I'm even less likely to believe this than I was before. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: That's not my IP JellyBaby1 (talk) 15:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reasonable chance of that being an accurate statement. I've revoked talk page access here to prevent further trolling. --Yamla (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]