Jump to content

User talk:Jeh/Archives/2016/06

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Edits to Windows NT by 94.122.113.28

I'm guessing that the edits you reverted may have been done with the "help" of some tool - perhaps all they meant to do was put assembly language at the beginning of the list of implementation languages (a bogus thing to do, as I suspect there's about 1% or less of NT source code, even NT core kernel and low-level user-mode code, in assembler language), but the tool moved some of the templates from the top and moved or removed some blank lines.

(Or maybe they thought it was somehow a Good Thing to move the templates from the top. Also bogus.)

In either case, reverting them was the right thing to do. Guy Harris (talk) 22:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

It's far less than 1% even of the kernel, even using MS's definition of the kernel (separate from other user-mode code). Only a few routines in the kernel and the HAL are in AL. Examples: the first stages of interrupt and exception handling; thread context switching; I/O port and register access. Jeh (talk) 03:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)