User talk:Jeffro100

Image copyright problem with Image:Xbox360full_500x526.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Xbox360full_500x526.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to WWE One Night Stand

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are certain this information is correct, please add a reliable reference to verify the information. Thank you. TJ Spyke 22:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Edge_the_champ.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Edge_the_champ.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to WWE vengeance, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 02:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Nitro logo.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nitro logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kip Smithers ^T/C 13:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Nitro logo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Nitro logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kip Smithers ^T/C 11:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to North American Man/Boy Love Association, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: North American Man/Boy Love Association was changed by Jeffro100 (c) (t) deleting 41759 characters on 2007-12-09T03:02:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to North American Man/Boy Love Association, you will be blocked from editing. —slakr^\ talk / 03:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to North American Man/Boy Love Association, you will be blocked from editing. —slakr^\ talk / 03:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Come on...

Although I do not agree with the organization, itself, edits to the page should adhere to neutral point of view policy and should be constructive (and not vandalism). That is, allow readers to decide for themselves that the organization is good/bad/whatever. After all, you learned about the organization by visiting the page— shouldn't others be allowed to do the same thing without being flooded with a bunch of "ROFL"s? --slakr^\ talk / 03:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]