User talk:Jeffrey abbott

Article in progress will have in order over the next few days,

Keytar

Hi Jeffrey, One thing that would make the other editors happier would be if you could give more information on the printed sources. One thing that makes it harder in this case, though, is that some of the magazines you are referring to are only available in paper versions. It is so much easier to add references when you can add the Internet link to the online version of a magazine! Then other editors go to the magazine online to verify the information that you included. I would like to improve this article over the next few months, and you know a lot about keytars, so I would appreciate if you could put more information or suggestions in the Talk page of the Keytar article.OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

..........................................................................................................

Hi, if you would be so kind to ask me specific questions i will be more than happy to answer. Please keep in mind, some of this REALLY is pre-internet.

The last edits on the article are really messy. There are GIGANTIC holes between the Moog and Roland. The Williams Keytar. Without being rude, this instrument has had a very tiny impact on "Keytaring" its inclussion in the article should reflect that.

I want to be VERY clear though i am endorsed by companies that have an active interest on this topic, i think i have done VERY well to show no bias in their regard. What's important as always is that the instrument and the art are represented fairly. If you want clarity of these statements please feel free to email me anytime at keytarjeff@comcast.net.

Thanks, jeff