User talk:Jeffrey Montano
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Washington/Technical_Writing_and_Communication_in_Chemical_Engineering_(Winter) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jeffrey Montano, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Seongbeom's peer review
[edit]The article clearly describes the definition of process engineering. However, there might be different definitions from different resources or books. Therefore, it is important to present relevant references; where this definition comes from. For the description of process engineering and process system engineering, this article ignores to present references.
The article provides interesting historical backgrounds about process engineering. However, it needs to explain why process engineering is important as well. History of process engineering and process systems engineering should be placed in the first part of the article. After that area of focus in process engineering section should be described.
There are extensive of theories for process engineering (PID control, overshooting, and generic controls). The article should briefly explain about those theories. It might be a good idea to include some figures when a new concept of process engineering is explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeberty84 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Seongbeom's updated peer review
[edit]Process engineering is one of the conventional fields in chemical/ mechanical engineering. Now, techniques from process engineering are used in a wide of applications. 1. Simple but strong definition is required. As of now, the definition of process engineering is too long, and this makes readers confused. Also, some sentences in the introduction section are overlapped with the definition. 2. You explain areas of the process engineering and then show the history of process engineering. The order should be revised. First, explain history or background, and then describe areas of the same. This will enable readers to access the article easily. 3. Figures are required and minimize mathematical formulas. Wikipedia articles are designed not for experts but for beginners of the field. Mathematical formulas will make them confused. Instead of the formulas, use figures to describe fundamentals of process engineering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeberty84 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Response to Sebastian's Peer Review
[edit]Than you. I made the suggested cosmetic changes. I added more detail to the initial section and the overview section. I'm planning on adding a section of specific processes as you have suggested.