User talk:JefferyClark

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Character class (Dungeons & Dragons) into Player's Handbook. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The material about character classes is owned by Wizards of the Coast, a list of the classes found in the PHB does not constitute original material and thus attribution isn't required. JefferyClark (talk) 16:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]