User talk:Jeff Hawke

Leica Minilux

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Leica Minilux, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.leicapages.com/minilux.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hz-program.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Hz-program.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Luc orient cover 6.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Luc orient cover 6.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Luc orient cover 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Luc orient cover 3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EidosMedia

I think it's unfortunate that you reverted the EidosMedia article to the version created by a company contractor that has been flagged as advertising/promotion and because of the writer's conflict of interest. If you want to make the article better, please make constructive changes. I am sure there are myriad ways to make the story better. But there is no reason to revert to the version created by a company employee. Please consider reversing your edit. Muckrkr (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Muckrkr[reply]

The article is flagged to say "Please help improve it by rewriting promotional content from a neutral point of view and removing any inappropriate external links." I did just that by rewriting the content to make it more of a neutral point of view and removing unsourced information, such as the statement that it has 250 employees and foreign subsidiaries.

If you have constructive changes, please make them. If there are positive items to add, please do -- rather than just erasing all the changes across the board. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muckrkr (talk • contribs) 09:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EidosMedia involvement

Good morning. I've been monitoring the situation at EidosMedia in the last week since a COI editor was blocked for edit warring in the article. Can you explain to me how your account suddenly became active after 7 years just to restore this article back to the COI editor's preferred version? Are you involved with EidosMedia or were you contacted to edit on behalf of DSeeB (talk · contribs)? --Spike Wilbury (talk) 12:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

==Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. --

I raised concerns about your COI, similar to Spike Wilbury's, since you acknowledged you know people at EidosMedia and only reactived your account after 7 years to revert to the version of EidosMedia created by a company contractor that was flagged for resembling advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muckrkr (talk • contribs) 10:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]