User talk:JeduthunRowe

re Teen Mania Ministries

I have and will continue to undo your edits to the above article, all the while that you attempt to turn the page into a critique of the subject. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be neutral, which is arrived at by use of the best, reliable sources and the Wikipedia:Due weight ascribed to any particular viewpoint. The use of quotes by individuals with no or little notability criticising the ministry (or its founders or its methods) are as inappropriate as similar laudatory comments from non notable proponents. If you feel the content you wish to include is within policy, then you will need to find consensus at the article talkpage. However, If you continue to edit war in an attempt to place your particular pov content, you will run the risk of having sanctions enacted upon your account. This is your first and last "non official" warning. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies; I assumed the issue was with length rather than substance. I'll leave it alone. JeduthunRowe (talk) 14:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An IP deleted a link to a blog that has a negative attitude toward Teen Mania; you restored it with this note:

"Undoing yet another COI deletion by Teen Mania's IP. The Recovering Alumni link has consensus to be included."

Although I personally want to have that link there, I'm not sure WP allows it. See Point 11 here. I have been unable to find the consensus to which you refer. Yopienso (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been mentioned before in the talk page, but I can see why it would be controversial by WP's guidelines. Here is a recent RS that may serve the purpose: http://www.tylerpaper.com/article/20111105/NEWS01/111109887 JeduthunRowe (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]