User talk:Jeberight

Project Bravo

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Project Bravo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Brianyoumans 23:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have removed the "prod" tag, I have nominated this article for deletion via the 'Article for Deletion' process. You can add your comments to the discussion via the link at the top of the article. Brianyoumans 21:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Project Bravo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 21:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of J smoove

A tag has been placed on J smoove, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nyttend 05:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not vandalize Wikipedia like you did in the Lil Wayne article.--_ BaRiMzI _ 20:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenacious D

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Tenacious D page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru 20:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]