User talk:Jebcubed/Archives/2019/October

A barnstar for you!!!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 11:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 11:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Cheers for that

I was fiddling with Huggle's warn settings, clearly I need to make a couple of tweaks! SITH (talk) 13:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@StraussInTheHouse:, Yeah, I found it kinda unusual to warn yourself for reverting other people's vandalism. Never used Huggle myself. How's it different from Twinkle? Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 13:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Jebcubed, Huggle uses ORES and other indicators depending on the filter you use to identify edits that might need looking at. It then loads them up into a queue and you have the standard Twinkle options. I use both; but if I'm in a less observant mood or if my broadband is slow I'll use Huggle so I don't end up loading good edits. Best, SITH (talk) 13:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

StraussInTheHouse, so, if I'm reading this right, you're saying it's basically like a version of Recent Changes that only shows edits that hit certain filters? Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 13:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Jebcubed, essentially, yes. I believe you can make Huggle's filters correlate with anything in the MediaWiki edit filter but "filter" in the Huggle sense can rely on other indicators. More info (and a download link if you're interested) can be found at WP:HUGGLE. SITH (talk) 13:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

StraussInTheHouse, I'll have to give it a try sometime. Thanks! Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 17:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Misclick, I assume? Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 13:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jebcubed, Yep thanks! - Samf4u (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

hey? why do u delete my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ah boa (talk • contribs) 18:07, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

hey

	QS pls help
	hi there, why are u deleting my page? Ah boa (talk) 18:09, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ah boa: you have created a page that appears to exist for the sole purpose of advertising a company. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and so the page was marked for deletion. Jeb³_{Talk at me here}^{What I've Done} 18:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of my Sandbox content (KKCG)

Hello, I am writing to contest the speedy deletion of the article entitled “KKCG”.

I'd like to publish this page again, KKCG important global company and I think it should take a place at Wikipedia. Please let me know, what was the main problem to avoid it further.

Was the main problem in linking to own websites as a source?

Hey Jeb! I am very proud of what you're doing! Wikipedia rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.138.37.138 (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Marthy007 (talk) 13:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

@Marthy007: The problem wasn't sources, it was the tone. The article was written in a blatantly promotional way. If you intend to try again, I recommend reading the following pages: WP:NPOV, WP:GNG, WP:MOS. Thanks, Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 14:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

2020 Republican Presidential Primaries

You have recently accused me of vandalism for properly editing said page. I started editing said page to include a candidate, Rocky De La Fuente, as a major candidate based upon fundraising and ballot access received, which are legitimate standards for determining status of a major candidate. Today, arbitrary criteria were added that indicates an unfair criteria that is not being enforced for Democratic candidates, and I have not seen efforts to remove candidates such as Messam or Sestak from a prominent position on that page. Your editing actions were inappropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joewendt (talk • contribs) 13:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

@Joewendt, just because you disagree with the criteria for inclusion on the page doesn't allow you to remove it. If you believe the criteria are biased, take it to the user who wrote the criteria and discuss why you think they are biased. Jeb³_{Talk at me here}^{What I've Done} 13:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

No, because said criteria was added TODAY, indicating that it was done purposefully to exclude a candidate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joewendt (talk • contribs) 14:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

@Joewendt the time criteria were added has no bearing on its purpose. Assume good faith, it is likely to be just a coincidence. Do not insist on seeing a conspiracy where none exist. Jeb³_{Talk at me here}^{What I've Done} 15:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)