User talk:Jebcubed/Archives/2019/February
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jebcubed. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for dedicating your time and energy to patrolling recent changes and removing vandalism and disruption! Keep up the good work! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC) |
- It doesn't appear that you're familiar yet with warning users. After we revert vandalism or other disruptive edit, we'll typically follow-up by warning the user on their user talk page. A good tool to enable in your preferences (under the gadgets tab) is Twinkle. It will help you by making the process of leaving warnings and notices much easier (along with providing many other useful tools). If you have questions about any of this, please feel free to message me on my user talk page here and I'll be happy to help! Thanks again for your dedication and time - it's highly appreciated! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Some advice
Hello, noticed you where also very active fighting vandalism, there is a question on my talkpage about if I should Roleback the edits to Yaffa Eliach. The editor has removed imformation saying the it is biased/ or has personal attacks. As far as I can see there isn't any personal attacks or biased imformation. Should I Roleback the edits? A 10 fireplane Imform me 19:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Overall, I'd say that the edits should be reverted. While overall seeming negative, nothing about the removed content seems overly intended to discredit the subject. I'd also leave the editor a message asking to explain in detail why the removed content is biased. Jeb3Talk at me here 19:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Awesome I will, thank you A 10 fireplane Imform me 19:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- He broke the death template by mistake, but he was acting in a constructive direction - the article has become a WP:COATRACK for rather fringe Polish nationalists attacks on her personal story - that was not related to her rather notable academic career (her Wapo obit has the 10k of text you reverted... In one line). It was not vandalism - though quite possibly it would have been challenged.Icewhiz (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Yaffa Eliach page
I am not amazing with computers, I must apologize for that. I did not mean to erase things like her age and other things of the sort. What I did intend to do is lay down the facts. The facts are, the polls killed her family, the fact that some angry polish man is trying to discredit her story, doesn't mean it goes up on the page. Her life story, is her life story. What is not part of her life story and career is some man trying to discredit her. Please revert the page to my most recent edit. I will do my best to add as much relevant information as possible. To be clear, this was not vandalism. I apologise if I accidentally violated a sub rule while trying to correct the facts. Bobbob5194 (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)