User talk:Jean Fume

SHORT PRESENTATION :
Sébastien "Seb" ***, born January 27, 1961, engineer, lives in Haute-Loire (France).
I'm here to "spend time" and relax.

Welcome!

Hello, Jean Fume, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 15:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcoming. Jean Fume (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tilikum (orca) ‎. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 15:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LoudLizard. These informations were correct and confirmated by the first source : {Document shown in documentary Blackfish states "born 12/1981"} (12 is the twelth month, that is to say december). It's only an estimation, but it's the information given by the source and we should indicate the same in the article. It's a simple matter of consistency. Concerning the active years of Tilikum, ill for 10 months before his death, we can suppose that he didn't do anything during the 6 last days of his life. Cordially. Jean Fume (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jean Fume. Please accept my apologies for incorrectly marking this as vandalism, and thanks for letting me know! As I'm sure you understand, the article has recently been vandalised quite frequently, and quite a lot of vandalism involves new users editing dates, numbers and the like. I agree that the article needs to match the source content. Please feel free to change the date, but make sure to clearly cite the first source. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 14:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I accept your apologies. We all have the right to make mistakes. We are humans, not robots:). Cordially. Jean Fume (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mont Mézenc (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mont Mézenc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seen. Thanks. Jean Fume (talk) 01:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jean Fume, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seen. Thanks. Jean Fume (talk) 01:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meygal (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meygal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seen. Thanks. Jean Fume (talk) 01:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meygal has been accepted

Meygal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seen. Thanks. Jean Fume (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For a better supervision

[1] / [2] (the diff) , my answer : OK (user = DrStrauss) ;

[3] / [4] (the diff) , my answer : [5] , new answer of MatthewVanitas : below , my answers : below and [6] ;

[7] / [8] (better diff) , my answer : [9] , new answer of Robert McClenon : [10] , my answer : [11] ;

[12] , my answer : [13] , EDIT : [14] (user = ColinFine).

Pages concerned

[15] (now OK) ;

[16]. EDIT, 25/01/17, 03:11 : OK.

Syntax on the English Wikipedia

To notify someone -> On the French Wikipédia : {{Notif|}}. On the English Wikipedia : {{ping|}}.

To avoid unpleasant surprises like this : only edit the SECTIONS.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mont Mézenc has been accepted

Mont Mézenc, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Cordially. Jean Fume (talk) 03:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remplace this by the title of your message

To do