Jump to content

User talk:JeanPichette

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Robert Pichette

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Robert Pichette, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ~EnviroboyTalkContribs - 03:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:BIO, being related to a well-known person does not establish notability. You asked how to move this article to the French section. You should check out http://fr.wikipedia.org ~EnviroboyTalkContribs - 03:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from an article that you created yourself, even if you use the {{hangon}}. Thank you. ~EnviroboyTalkContribs - 03:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Pichette for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Pichette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Pichette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Pichette

[edit]

Reliable sourcing for a Wikipedia article is media coverage about him. Newspapers, radio, TV, magazines, published books. That's the only kind of referencing that's ever acceptable for getting a person into Wikipedia — none of the references present in the article, as it's written right now, count for anything. Bearcat (talk) 03:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well there are few news websites that I have found:

News websites: CBS NEWS : http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/q-a-robert-pichette-recalls-creating-new-brunswick-s-flag-1.2953550

ACADIE NOUVELLE: http://www.acadienouvelle.com/actualites/2015/03/25/le-drapeau-du-n-b-honore-a-fredericton/

RADIO-CANADA: http://ici.radio-canada.ca/sujet/route-sud#chapitre-4

Google Newspapers: Ottawa Citizen : https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2194&dat=19690217&id=m8gyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=G-0FAAAAIBAJ&pg=2934,96807&hl=en

L'Évangéline : https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1138&dat=19770513&id=86sqAAAAIBAJ&sjid=hF8EAAAAIBAJ&pg=4267,5044255&hl=en

Le Madawaska : https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2315&dat=19631003&id=z0onAAAAIBAJ&sjid=CG4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=3242,3180437&hl=en

Published Book: http://fraser.cc/FlagsCan/Provinces/NB.html

I will try to find more documentation.

  • The discussion stays open for a minimum of seven days after nomination; it is kept or deleted based on the consensus of participants in the discussion. If there aren't enough participants to establish a consensus, it gets relisted for a second week; if there's still no consensus it gets relisted for a third week. There's no other way for the discussion to close prematurely. Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]