User talk:Jdubman

Spokane, Washington

Spokane, Washington is now a "good article", in part due to the excellent illustrations you've created. Thanks for your work on behalf of the project. Will Beback talk 04:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposed between WikiProject Eastern Washington and WikiProject Washington

Greetings! You are receiving this notice as you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eastern Washington. There is a poll going on at the Washington WikiProject talk page to merge the Eastern Washington project into the larger WikiProject Washington as a task force. Please indicate in the poll if you are for / against this merger, or post any comments/concerns you have. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Washington at 04:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumioko (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumioko (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spokane Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centennial Trail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Microsoft Band, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Target, Android and Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Voiland College of Engineering and Architecture, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington and Pullman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jdubman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpokaneCliffDrive Dec 2015.jpg

Please provide a reason why you think it can't be moved to commons. Thanks. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpokaneArenaLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpokaneArenaLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jdubman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pence-Cole Valley Transit Center

The article Pence-Cole Valley Transit Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bus stop, which often fails general notability (see WP:BUSOUTCOMES)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 05:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spokane Community College (Spokane Transit)

The article Spokane Community College (Spokane Transit) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bus stop, which often fails general notability (see WP:BUSOUTCOMES)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 05:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pence-Cole Valley Transit Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pence-Cole Valley Transit Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pence-Cole Valley Transit Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sounder Bruce 22:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spokane%2C_Washington&type=revision&diff=860904133&oldid=860353368

Sure that's not the hill top south of Dishman Hills? I don't know the area well, but that might be my first guess. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great question! Sounds like you may be thinking of Krell Hill. Krell Hill is toward the southeast of Spokane so it would fall out of the frame of the photo, which is aimed almost due east toward Liberty Lake and Idaho.

Gah, I'm sorry I said "south" when I meant "west". There's a smaller hill line to the west and closer to downtown (just west of Iller Creek) that has a few radio/TV towers on it. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 02:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jdubman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spokane Community College Transit Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Spokane

Can you fill out some details at File:Flag of Spokane, Washington.svg? Just need the image you originally based the SVG drawing on so that the accompanying article can pass its GAN. Sounder Bruce 07:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SounderBruce. Just added a source in the summary/info box on the file. Apologies for the delay...hadn't logged in to Wikipedia in a while. Jdubman (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riverfront Park

Nice work on expanding Riverfront Park. Would you be interested in submitting it to WP:DYK? It would qualify as a five-fold expansion, but you would need to add more inline sources (which is also required for most Wikipedia content). Sounder Bruce 04:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SounderBruce I would love to at some point! Thanks for the suggestion. I'd want to wait until I get the article to a good point though (still many blanks, and much more I can add on the history). So it might be a couple weeks more since I tend to edit Wiki in spurts, and I also still need to finish getting those other University District and WSU Spokane articles I've been working on the over the last couple days to a good point. Is there a specific timeframe you were thinking? Jdubman (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK requires that you nominate within seven days, but you can take a bit more time after nominating to make improvements (like adding the requisite sources). I'm emphasizing the sources since it's a good habit to form while writing (or even before writing). Sounder Bruce 05:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SounderBruce Maybe we can nominate toward the end of this week then? It would give some more time to polish it, and then of course polish it more after the nomination. Jdubman (talk) 05:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SounderBruce We're now up to about 70 references and a lot of expanded subsections. I think we can probably nominate it now. Thoughts? Jdubman (talk) 04:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should be fine to nominate, but you would need to have a citation for every paragraph in order to ensure its success. I see a few that lack citations or use ones that don't cover all of the information in its given paragraph. Sounder Bruce 05:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University District (Spokane, Washington), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Numerica Skate Ribbon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skating (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington)

On 4 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the installation of a garbage-eating sculpture in Riverfront Park caused an uproar from goat farmers, concerned that it perpetuated the false stereotype that goats eat anything? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 00:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! The article actually looks like it could easily meet the Good articles criteria. I encourage you to nominate it if you feel comfortable. Sounder Bruce 04:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And many thanks to you, SounderBruce, for the suggestion to nominate it for DYK! GA definitely seems like the next logical step. Looking at the criteria, I agree, it probably would meet it. Since there's no time limit on this one, I might clean up the article a little more first, then nominate it. Jdubman (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coeur d'Alene, ID article help

Hi JDubman, I would like to ask your help with the CDA article. I've been working on it for the last three months and nominated it for GA and I think it's basically done content wise and I just need someone to create the red link Main article that is under the Notable People section, the List of people from Coeur d'Alene, Idaho article so you or I can dump that list in it and get it off the Main article. I wouldn't feel right if I just deleted the list that people made and I don't want to make an account to do this one last edit. Thanks! 2001:5B0:4FC0:68A8:E01B:73FB:BC56:6B2E (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also while I have your ear...if it isn't too much trouble and if it's possible, it would be nice if the Economy of Spokane, Washington article could be renamed to something more broad like Economy of the Spokane–Coeur d'Alene MSA, Economy of metropolitan Spokane, or Economy of Greater Spokane or something like that to better fit the new scope of the article. I completely reworked the article a while back and tried to model it after the Economy of metropolitan Detroit article. I didn't think it made sense to limit the scope of the article to just Spokane city proper or the Spokane MSA especially since the Coeur d'Alene MSA is already lumped in with it in a CSA and will eventually be part of the same MSA some day in the future.

Sorry for all the requests, if you don't want to do it or don't have time then just ignore this and thanks anyway! 2001:5B0:4FC0:68A8:6064:E91F:BAB6:59A6 (talk) 18:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington)

The article Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Riverfront Park (Spokane, Washington) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Might re-nominate the Riverfront Park article

Hi Jdubman, I wanted to say I think you have done an excellent job on the Riverfront Park article and it looks fantastic. Its well researched, it's very detailed and well written and contains a variety of source materials that are properly cited and everything. I was super excited when I saw it in the queue of Good Article Nominations when I was working on the Coeur d'Alene GAN. You can tell you put in a lot of work on it looks like it's a low lying fruit for a Good Article Nomination, which is why I was surprised to see the nomination was shelved after the reviewer was unable to get a response from you after a long absence; I was wondering if I should swoop in and take over the nomination work, but I didn't want to step on your toes. I hope you are well and everything is alright with you.

I wanted you to know that I was thinking about nominating it again so it can reach it's full potential; I don't want all that hard work to go to waste or wait a few years to see if someone else does it all the while the website url references go dead, creating work rooting through everything and hopefully getting archived urls or whatever. I think if there's a time to re-nominate it would make sense to do it sooner rather than later and I'm not sure if you had plans to re-nominate it or wanted to have the honor of going through the nomination process and taking it across the finish line yourself. Not sure if you think that's a big deal, but I just wanted to give you a heads up about my intentions in case you cared or were interested in pitching in at all if you have the time and are able. Again, I hope you are well and if you have anything to say about that these potential plans, put those comments below on this Talk page since I am not a registered user and don't have a real Talk page. Thanks Jdubman for all your contributions to the Spokane area articles and in general... 2001:5B0:4FC0:1788:F1CB:FD2E:28FE:A5B2 (talk) 23:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words - go for it! I tend to edit Wikipedia in spurts, contributing a lot for a couple weeks, then taking really long breaks in between. That's sort of what happened earlier this year with the GAN. It sat in the queue for a long time, and by the time I logged back in, I saw that the reviewer had already denied it due to my inaction (break). So if you could step in and clean it up I do not mind at all! Jdubman (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear all is well. The article is in the queue again, hopefully it won’t take as long as last time for someone to take a look at it. Feel free to take that IP address off the nomination page and replace it with yours if you want, and pitch in if you come off your break. People might think it’s a joke in the queue if they see a rando without an account and not the primary contributor is listed as nominator. I would still check regularly for any review comments when they come through and help out with the nomination :)

2001:5B0:4FC0:1788:DD55:440F:83DD:BBC3 (talk) 04:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpokaneCliffDrive Dec 2015.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SpokaneCliffDrive Dec 2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:10, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Podium (sports facility), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sportsplex.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do a Featured List nomination procedure?

Hey Jdubman, Ive been working on the List of tallest buildings in Spokane article while waiting for a reviewer for the Riverfront Park article and I think its a good candidate for a Featured List nomination. I was trying to do it today but it looks like you have to register for an account, which I dont want to do. If you could do the nomination procedure or do it yourself, go for it. :) 2001:5B0:4FC1:2348:1915:6E06:61A2:E61F (talk) 01:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Riverfront Park GAN

The article is now a Good Article. Congrats and keep up the good work! :) T85cr1ft19m1n (talk) 01:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NSC $2.x billion

Do you recall in any fashion the origin of this $2.1 billion figure? Maybe roughly the plan discussed in this Spokesman-Review article? Thanks Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 04:19, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spokane Streetcar Feasibility Study 2006 - Rendering Mallon Ave.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spokane Streetcar Feasibility Study 2006 - Rendering Mallon Ave.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 09:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Spokane Convention Center Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spokane Convention Center Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jdubman. Thank you for your work on History of high-capacity transit in Spokane, Washington. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Its not really a historical article. Set in the modern and needs renamed, unless you expand to include the last couple of hundred years. Did they not trams or buses back then?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 08:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Riverfront Park Spokane Logo 2017.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Riverfront Park Spokane Logo 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]